User:Jondel/copyright violations Sept 16
September 16[edit]
- Jondel questionable items
- Edgar Cayce on Karma (contributed by Jondel) from [1] -- Netoholic @ 04:31, 2004 Sep 16 (UTC)
- Its them who are doing the copyrigtht violations. I know what I wrote in Wikipedia and recognize my own way of writng. The wikipedia version is the original. I will be writing to the webmaster at the nazarene site.--Jondel 04:34, 16 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- See Talk:Edgar Cayce on Karma. There is evidence that indeed the external site copied our text. Lupo 07:58, 16 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Golpez also doesn't think so. Please see DanBlackham's statement too at the talk page. --Jondel 08:30, 16 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- I have the e-mail from the webmaster who responded saying that they don't claim copyrights. I will be posting this shortly.--Jondel 05:08, 17 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Please look at e-mail confirmations--Jondel 06:58, 17 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- I have the e-mail from the webmaster who responded saying that they don't claim copyrights. I will be posting this shortly.--Jondel 05:08, 17 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- The following line can now be found at the bottom of the page of www.nazareneway.com/karma.html:"Portions of this page were compiled from the Wikipedia article on Karma and are licensed under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License.
". This means that they copied wikipedia and not the other way around. It has also been restorede as a copyright non-violation by user Gary D, a lawyer.Thank you very much for all your help on this matter.--Jondel 11:29, 18 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- HSDL-9100-021 proximity sensor (contributed by Jondel) from [2] and possibly others. -- Netoholic @ 04:46, 2004 Sep 16 (UTC)
- This is not a copyright violation. It wasn't copied. This is a rewrite based on the Agilent press release. Please see Alternatives. Please examine the wordings closely.--Jondel 05:13, 16 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- That describe what to do in order to solve a copyright problem. Re-write on the /Temp pages, and then an admin will delete the copyrighted history of the article. -- Netoholic @ 05:21, 2004 Sep 16 (UTC)
- Keep the article. Re-writing original text does not violate copyright laws. Facts and ideas cannot be copyrighted. Davodd 00:05, Sep 17, 2004 (UTC)
- That describe what to do in order to solve a copyright problem. Re-write on the /Temp pages, and then an admin will delete the copyrighted history of the article. -- Netoholic @ 05:21, 2004 Sep 16 (UTC)
- This is not a copyright violation. It wasn't copied. This is a rewrite based on the Agilent press release. Please see Alternatives. Please examine the wordings closely.--Jondel 05:13, 16 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- I have established that the other pages were not copied . I am establishing that this is a rewrite. Must I also e-mail Agilent for permission to display the rewrite? If so please extend the 7 day deadline.--Jondel 02:09, 19 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Masao (contributed by Jondel) from [3]. -- Netoholic @ 04:55, 2004 Sep 16 (UTC)
- Let me rewrite.--Jondel 05:06, 16 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- The Agilent article was already a rewrite. Delete it then , I DON'TR CARE. The Masao was rewritten but not completely, too many of the same wordings were used. The Edgar Cayce on Karma my original article. The Nazarene copied it from here. --Jondel 05:26, 16 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Languages of the Philippines- Found not to be copyvio, see Talk:Languages of the Philippines/Archive 1 -- Netoholic @ 07:05, 2004 Sep 17 (UTC)