Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/"Kingston Advice"

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Carrp | Talk 18:32, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)

"Kingston Advice"[edit]

Another not terribly notable Clash song. While the Clash has quite a few songs that I reckon are worthy of articles, few of them are off Sandinista! (great album though it is), yet there seems to be a drive to get an article for every song on that album. This one is just a really bad, incorrect article anyway. The single sentence synopsis seems to be taken from just 2 lines in the song. Delete this. Maybe someday someone will write a good article on White Man in Hammersmith Palais. Not holding my breath though. Oh, and the quotes don't belong either. -R. fiend 15:36, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)

  • While I'm all for keeping albums, I'd prefer not to keep songs unless they're really really notable on their own (meme-level). As such, delete. Radiant! 19:43, Mar 1, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, as per my previous votes on these album tracks. Megan1967 03:21, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Any reason not to merge this? I agree that it shouldn't exist independent of the album. —Korath (Talk) 08:34, Mar 3, 2005 (UTC)
    • Do you mean other than the fact it's factually incorrect? -R. fiend 16:13, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)
      • Hm. A point. I missed the "incorrect" in your original post, sorry. (Delete.) —Korath (Talk) 17:29, Mar 3, 2005 (UTC)
  • Rename, then merge/redirect. Kappa 11:07, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC) no vote Kappa 00:42, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.