User talk:Soakologist

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Petronas Towers[edit]

You reverted my change to the World's Tallest Building template. Currently, the article itself acknowledges this as once one of the world's tallest buildings: "The Petronas Towers (also known as the Petronas Twin Towers), in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (3°9′28.26″N, 101°42′41.94″E), were once the world's tallest buildings when measured from the level of the main entrance to the structural or architectural top. It has since been unseated by the Taipei 101 on October 17, 2003."

The rooftop, as I have understood from other declarations does not matter, as the spires are higher than the Sears Tower.

Please reply on my user page or open it up for conversation on Talk:Petronas Towers. -Sean Hayford O'Leary 05:48, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.

Here are some tips to help you get started:

Good luck!

Meelar (talk) 04:22, Mar 16, 2005 (UTC)

Image copyright problem RE: Image:05GovDanRT300.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:05GovDanRT300.jpg. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law. We need you to specify two things on the image description page:

  • The copyright holder, and
  • The copyright status

The copyright holder is usually the creator. If the creator was paid to make this image, then their employer may be the copyright holder. If several people collaborated, then there may be more than one copyright holder. If you created this image, then you are the copyright holder.

Because of the large number of images on Wikipedia, we've sorted them using image copyright tags. Just find the right tag corresponding to the copyright status of this image, and paste it onto the image description page like this: {{TAGHERE}}.

There are 3 basic ways to licence an image on Wikipedia:

  • The copyright holder gets the best protection of his work by licencing their work under an open content license like the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike licence. If you have the express permission of the copyright holder to licence their work under the above licence, use the image copyright tag: {{cc-by-sa-2.5}}. The GNU Free Documentation License is another choice for licencing one's work. Again, if you have the express permission of the copyright holder, use the tag: {{GFDL}}.
  • The copyright holder can also release his work into the public domain, see here for images released into the public domain.
    • Images from certain sources are automatically release into the Public Domain. This is true for most governments like the federal United States government. (See here for images from the government of the USA and here for other governments) However not all governments release their work into the public domain, such as the UK government (See here for images from the UK government). Non-free licence governments are listed here.
  • Also, in some cases, an image is copyrighted but allowed on Wikipedia because of Fair Use. To see if this image qualifies and then how to tag it, see Wikipedia:Fair use.

For any other sources of for more information see Wikipedia:Image copyright tags. Please remember that if you don't tag your images, they will be deleted.

P.S. If you have uploaded other images without including copyright tags, please go back and tag them. Also, please tag all images that you upload in the future.

If you have any questions, just leave a message on my talk page. Thanks again.

(My apologies, as I should have added this notice earlier. Please see Image_talk:05GovDanRT300.jpg for an explanation.)--TCC (talk) (contribs) 05:52, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Luxury Car Manufacruers[edit]

Hi, I noticed that you added Daimler to the list of current luxury car manufacturers. Do have any links that lead to Daimler's site since as far as I know Daimler does not currently manufacture vehicles itself but only converts Jaguars into stretch limousines. Thanx Gerdbrendel 16:54, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Templates[edit]

Please don't leave {{DrugsNotice}} on article pages. This is a template intended for talkpages, and should not clutter article material. JFW | T@lk 22:43, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sears Tower[edit]

Thanks for this awesome image: Image:Sears Tower ss.jpg! Would you maybe have a version with a larger resolution? If so, I'd love to recommend it as a featured picture candidate. Thanks again. -Quasipalm 13:46, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I recently took a photograph of the Chase Tower in Indianapolis and uploaded a copy of it to Wikipedia. The image that I took is of better quality quality than Image:Bankonetower.jpg which you uploaded. I hope you don't mind, but since the image I uploaded was better, I replaced yours with mine on the article. If you like, I can delete your image since it is unused now? --Durin 16:34, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sure man, yours looks a lot better anyway. Thanks for the heads-up though. Soakologist 04:07, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Hi there! I've noticed that you've edited articles pertaining to the Eastern Orthodox Church. I wanted to extend an invitation to you to join the WikiProject dedicated to organizing and improving articles on the subject, which can be found at: WikiProject Eastern Orthodoxy. This WikiProject was begun because a need was perceived to raise the level of quality of articles on Wikipedia which deal with the Eastern Orthodox Church.

You can find information on the project page about the WikiProject, as well as how to join and how to indicate that you are a member of the project. Additionally, you may be interested in helping out with our collaboration of the month. I hope you'll consider joining and thank you for your contributions thus far! —A.S. Damick talk contribs 23:00, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Pentium4mlogo.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Pentium4mlogo.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:44, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:05GovDanRT300.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:05GovDanRT300.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Chowbok 01:16, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:IIT seal.JPG)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:IIT seal.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 11:38, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Indianapolis-Anderson-Columbus CSA in ChiPitts article[edit]

I reverted your change, because I-A-C is the official U.S. Government name for that Combined Statistical Area, a name determined by an impartial nationwide process (and not because of any bias or partisanship). I've also removed the link to the Nine-County Region because the I-A-C CSA covers one heck of a lot more territory than that, and needs its own article (which you would be better qualified than I to write). For that matter, the feds' official definition of the Indianapolis-Carmel, IN Metropolitan Statistical Area now includes ten counties! (The nine, plus Brown, I believe.)--Orange Mike 15:44, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Illtech logo.gif[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Illtech logo.gif. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:08, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Illtech logo.gif)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Illtech logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 03:01, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Message on Beatle project page[edit]

I don't know why you removed my comments on the Beatle project page, but please don't do that again. Talk page comments like that should not be deleted arbitrarily. Thank you. John Cardinal 23:34, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Got your reply. I understand. John Cardinal 23:37, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Oxford arms hires.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Oxford arms hires.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Riana (talk) 23:58, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Revolver US.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Revolver US.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Andyreply 08:12, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Revolver US Release[edit]

I did provide an edit summary with a reason the second time I reverted it: "rv, per before", referring to the first time I reverted it, where I used the edit summary "rv per WP:ALBUM and for logical article structure". Per WP:ALBUM (specifically WP:ALBUM#Infobox and WP:ALBUM#Article body) the infobox should be at the top of the article. Very many albums are released in significantly different versions, and they almost always use a single infobox at the top of the article, per WP:ALBUM. In this case the main infobox already covers the U.S. version, with a U.S. album length and U.S. chronology, so adding a second infobox that duplicates this information is redundant. The US cover should be included as an alternate cover in the standard infobox, per WP:ALBUM#Template: Extra album cover 2. With logical article structure I was meant that the existing article structure was more logical, with the section "American release" being a subsection of "Release history". Your change caused the article structure to be illogical in that the track listing for the U.S. release was not a subsection of the section with the U.S. infobox. The current track listing section is in line with WP:ALBUM#Track listing though, so changing that does not seem like a good idea. Hope that explains my reasoning. I will now merge the infoboxes, so that the standard infobox contains the information the separate infobox. I hope that is an acceptable compromise. --PEJL 00:45, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, and have a nice day. --PEJL 04:01, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Oxford arms hires.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Oxford arms hires.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:23, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:P4ee.gif[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:P4ee.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. PxMa 15:14, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:P4 ht new.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:P4 ht new.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 17:07, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Indbell logo.GIF listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Indbell logo.GIF, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —PNG crusade bot (feedback) 04:26, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:P4ee.gif listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:P4ee.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —PNG crusade bot (feedback) 18:52, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Pink Floyd 68[edit]

This'll take a couple minutes to sort out, please hold on. east.718 at 06:15, January 25, 2008

 Done - you should remove the noncommercial stuff when tagging it. Have a nice day! east.718 at 06:17, January 25, 2008

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Revolver US.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Revolver US.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:03, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Pentium4mlogo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pentium4mlogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. JaGatalk 22:54, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An image created by you has been promoted to valued picture status
Your image, File:Sears Tower ss.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Jujutacular T · C 17:35, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations![edit]

Congratulations Soakologist, your image Image:Sears Tower ss.jpg was the Random Picture of the Day! It looked like this:

The Willis Tower, America's tallest building
Image credit: Soakologist (talk · contribs)

.

- Presidentman (talk · contribs) (Talkback) Random Picture of the Day 23:42, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library now offering accounts from Cochrane Collaboration (sign up!)[edit]

Cochrane Collaboration is an independent medical nonprofit organization consisting of over 28,000 volunteers in more than 100 countries. The collaboration was formed to organize medical scholarship in a systematic way in the interests of evidence-based research: the group conducts systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials of health-care interventions, which it then publishes in the Cochrane Library.

Cochrane has generously agreed to give free, full-access accounts to 100 medical editors. Individual access would otherwise cost between $300 and $800 per account. Thank you Cochrane!

If you are stil active as a medical editor, come and sign up :)

Cheers, Ocaasi t | c 20:01, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:Venn cars.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 21:11, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:Chrysbldg solitaire.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused. Low quality. Superseded by files at c:Category:Exterior of the Chrysler Building.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 12:55, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect 6.9 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 31 § 6.9 until a consensus is reached. Okmrman (talk) 23:31, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]