Talk:Materiel

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	National militaries task force

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

This page was listed on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion in May, 2004. The result of that discussion was to keep the article. For an archive of the discussion, see Talk:Materiel/Delete.

Spelling[edit]

I've just moved this article back to "Materiel" from "Matériel" (with redirect from Matériel instead). Matériel is the French word, but the established English spelling is "materiel". Matériel indicates that you should stress the first "e", but in English you stress the last.

If we compare the major dictionaries, we find mixed views, but it's either "materiel" only or both spellings. None of them gives "matériel" as the only spelling:

Oxford only accepts "materiel" [1]
The 1913 Webster only accepted "materiel" [2]
Ultralingua only accepts "materiel" [3]
Online Etymology only accepts "materiel" [4]
American Heritage has "materiel" as first choice and "matériel" as alternative spelling [5]
Dictionary.com has "materiel" as first choice and "matériel" as alternative spelling [6]
Encarta has "matériel" as first choice and "materiel" as alternative spelling [7]
Infoplease (Random House) "matériel" as first choice and "materiel" as alternative spelling [8]
Merriam-Webster has a strange bug (when you search "matériel", it says it can't find it and throws up "materiel" as suggested entry three times, and these three links all lead to "matériel" with "materiel" as alternative spelling - and pronounciation stressing the last "e" [9]

If you check official military websites from the US, the UK and Australia, I don't think you'll find "matériel" ever used, only "materiel'.

The word's etymology is French, but that doesn't mean that the spelling must be, especially as you don't pronounce it in a French way in English, i.e. it is not regarded as a French word, but an English word. Thomas Blomberg 11:50, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

About this sentence: "Matériel indicates that you should stress the first "e", but in English you stress the last." Erm, no; French also stresses the last "e". The accent does not indicate stress, but pronunciation. Ratfox (talk) 15:17, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

material[edit]

It seems quite extraordinary to me that English feels obliged to use the French versions of words and phrases which it is perfectly well able to handle on its own: materiel (lexical) and court martial (syntactic). 'Materials' is a fairly obvious choice, another being 'material resources'. There are plenty of useful French words in English that nicely fill a gap (svelte, niche etc.), but this ludicrous form is not one of them. Pamour (talk) 07:47, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A good addition to this article would be the reason why the French word was chosen over the American one. --Joe Sewell (talk) 16:15, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe it's because it sounds like 'personnel'... Just guessing. 77.108.64.198 (talk) 11:53, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

American one?! You mean the word 'material' that developed in Middle English in England? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.58.24.158 (talk) 07:26, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Joe Sewell. I find this usage almost as annoying as "milch cow" instead of "milk cow". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.255.171.122 (talk) 15:22, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Examples[edit]

Tanks and bombers would be examples of materiel, right? Yev Yev (talk) 14:27, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]