User talk:David91

I am retired and currently unoccupied (although I harbour plans for a magnificent return to commercial life, usually involving the conquest of one or more major market niches and untold wealth). I am therefore perfectly qualified to obey the instruction, "do not create an article to promote yourself" since death (whether real or through boredom) will soon claim me. In the interim, I may scribble or tweak material within my fading expertise.

User:David91/Archive - Accumulated stuff User:David91/Archive - Accumulated stuff 2

A barnstar for your excellent work on sociology and law-related articles.

I am being readmitted to hospital for more tests. I will be away for some days. David91 14:50, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

I hope it is not serious, and I wish you well. Rob^Talk 15:24, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

I just wanted to let you know how impressed I am with your contributions to Wikipedia on legal matters, especially the article on provocation. Wish you good health and that whatever it is, I hope it's not too serious. Tír Eoghain abú 00:18, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

I hope all goes well. Gflores^Talk 05:05, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

Here's to hoping that the hospital isn't too boring and you get out quickly! Feel better soon. -- Natalya 11:27, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

I hope everything's ok. Have them bring you a laptop with wireless internet. :) --Fang Aili ^說嗎? 02:23, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

David, I see that you haven't edited since you went to the hospital. I hope you are OK. Maurreen 12:51, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

A request for help

Hello! I found you through seeing some of your posts on WikiProject Law's Talk page. I was impressed with your honesty and, well, this kind of comment in particular:

Everyday, I find pages that fail to state principles well or accurately. My reactions to particular stimuli vary from amusement to horror, but the response to each stimulus is always to correct it. ... By not addressing error when you find it, you are allowing that error to remain on a public site where it may mislead or confuse lay readers. As individuals who have identified yourselves with a particular interest in the law, I wonder why you are not more proactive to defend the accuracy of Wiki when statements of "law" are made.

You seem smart, and suitably and dedicatedly compulsive about fixing errors; just the kind of person we need to have going through the fan fiction article.

"Fan fiction" is usually defined as unauthorized or semi-unauthorized derivitive works (that is, they're done by fans and not "official", but the creator says it's OK to write it), most of which are nowadays published to the internet to websites such as fanfiction.net. As such, copyright law in any and all countries with access to the net has a huge impact on the international fan fiction community, and is obviously of great importance to the article on it. The problem is, of course, that both in the U.S. and other areas of the world, copyright law is inconsistent, as are books' or series' canon-creators' reactions and stances on fan fiction.

As such, the "Legal Issues" section of the fan fiction article is at current a complete mess. Almost all of it is completely unsourced and uncited, much of it contradictory and confusing to the reader, and some of it flat-out wrong, and just generally completely amatuerish, and plain awful. Additionally, there seems to be a bias towards U.S. law, with only tangential references to other countries' copyright laws, despite the fact that foreign copyright law can be of equal or in some cases greater importance.

I lack the resources, base knowledge and experience to fix the entire section on my own, so I've elected to implore a handful of WikiProject Law participants to help me fix it. Actually, basically, you and one other person whom I thought might be interested.

In any case, please help a hopeless American out? :) I'd like for this article to be the best it can be; I'm rather optimistically hoping to someday work it up to the Featured Article level of quality (even if it never becomes an FA, at least it would be really good, right?), though this may in large part depend on also improving the related articles, such as Mary Sue. Still, even improving the related articles will not fix the fact that the Legal Issues section is a complete and utter, uncited, unsourced mess.

Thank you for your time, Runa27 05:06, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

David, will you please contact Larry Sanger again using a different e-mail address. Mail to the address provided bounced. Thanks. Citizendium Staff.

Get Well Soon

Hey there

Just stopping by to say Get Well Soon!. Wikipedia misses you, and we hope you are back soon! Thanks a lot.

Cheers

--Anthonycfc (Talk to Me)   ^{(sandbox)   (E-Count)} 16:16, 12 Oct 2006 (UTC)

I second that. I hope you're well and can return shortly. -Tim Rhymeless (Er...let's shimmy) 08:11, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Get well soon your numorus edits have been very nice to read —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.209.212.140 (talk • contribs)

Can I Ask you some Legal Opinion

Hello,

I am impressed with your writing and need some legal advice on international divorce issues. Any chance you can help me?

My wife had I were married in Malaysia in 1994 and then lived in Japan till 2004. In 2004 she moved to CA and in June 2005 I moved to Ohio. We are both American. We have never lived together in the US but do file Married US tax returns. On Jan 4th, 2007, on a one day visit to CA she had divorce papers served on me and noow wants to unjustly take $$ from me and get alimony.

The evil woman is also having a realtionship with another man.

I am currently living in Korea for the last 5 months and will be here for about 1 more month. I believe I can get a divorce from her here in Korea based on her behaviour. My question is, does getting a divorce here nulify her ability to complete the divorce in CA? If so any other ideas about how to stop her ability to financial punish me?

Thanks Randy

write to me at genkiman69 at yahoo.com 192.44.136.113 02:42, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Keele

I have just met with the SCR on Israel-Palestine. Sadly, forgot to let you know in advance. Jeffrey Newman 85.210.255.81 01:01, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Bill of lading

If you still check this page, thanks for the great Bill of lading article! It was very helpful for my secured transactions class. Mangostar (talk) 18:08, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Fascism and the rhetoric of unification

An editor has nominated Fascism and the rhetoric of unification, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fascism and the rhetoric of unification and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 23:29, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Aestheticization as propaganda

I have nominated Aestheticization as propaganda, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aestheticization as propaganda. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:11, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:English criminal law

Template:English criminal law has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. James500 (talk) 22:31, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Conflict of divorce laws

The article Conflict of divorce laws has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

this is an essay with some scientific content. More about differences in divorce law, than on the conflict of law. Much should be done; I suggest it's fully unsalvalbe...

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. L.tak (talk) 21:53, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Conflict of nullity laws

The article Conflict of nullity laws has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The article is ultimately a piece of original research.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 212.50.182.151 (talk) 00:40, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Civil recognition of Jewish divorce

The article Civil recognition of Jewish divorce has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Original research largely by its creator as part of his series of work also of original research on the theme of the subject of the Conflict of laws; only an Israeli Jewish (religious) divorce can be recognized by civil authorities overseas, and that is only an automatic legal right in domestic law in the United Kingdom and in the Republic of Ireland; the article is unnecessarily, unacceptably and unreasonably hypothetical and legalistic, and ought to be merged with the main article, being Get (divorce document).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 212.50.182.151 (talk) 04:01, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Conflict of property laws

The article Conflict of property laws has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The article is ultimately a piece of original research.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 212.50.182.151 (talk) 08:39, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Civil recognition of Jewish divorce for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Civil recognition of Jewish divorce is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Civil recognition of Jewish divorce until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.


Concern, reason or rationale: It is an original research largely by its creator as part of his series of work also of original research on the theme of the subject of the Conflict of laws; only an Israeli Jewish (religious) divorce can be recognized by civil authorities overseas, and that is only an automatic legal right in domestic law in the United Kingdom and in the Republic of Ireland; the article is unnecessarily, unacceptably and unreasonably hypothetical and legalistic, and ought to be merged with the main article, being Get (divorce document). 212.50.182.151 (talk) 10:58, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is IP making unfounded accusations. Thank you. - 212.50.182.151 (talk) 09:41, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Zero tolerance (schools)

The article Zero tolerance (schools) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable, un-encyclopedic, written like an essay.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --L235 (talk) Ping when replying 22:02, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Crimin

Template:Crimin has been nominated for merging with Template:Criminology and penology. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Quest for Truth (talk) 13:56, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Ptol

Template:Ptol has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 02:18, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Conspiracy (Caesar) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Conspiracy (Caesar). Since you had some involvement with the Conspiracy (Caesar) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. — the Man in Question (in question) 22:29, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Conflict of contract laws for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Conflict of contract laws is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conflict of contract laws until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Tooncool64 (talk) 01:46, 21 January 2024 (UTC)