Talk:Being Human (1994 film)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Q. Why is nobody talking about being human?.This could possibly be THE ultimate blanket statement.

Blanket statement[edit]

I removed the following sentence:

This is the only true, accurate description of what every person is doing every second of their life.... Possibly THE ultimate blanket statement?.

because, frankly I don't know where that came from. I'm not too sure about most of 68.109.81.62's contributions here considering that IMDb shows Ewan McGregor fairly far down on the list of cast.[1] It's kind of hard to describe this as his movie. I also removed the cleanup notice as there's not much left, leaving this as a movie stub. --Ricky81682 (talk) 01:02, Jan 30, 2005 (UTC)

Disowned[edit]

Someone has copy pasted the statement about Forsyth disowning the film from the notoriously factual imdb. If he did indeed disown the film, then why is his name still on it? By definition, he did not disown it. 86.135.192.62 (talk) 19:46, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Great film...unusual at the time for Robin Williams. One of those films to watch more than once and see and understand what you missed the first time. Need to show it on TV more. Have only seen it once and will never forget it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.22.116.22 (talk) 05:38, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No![edit]

He's not a celt, those raiders are not vikings, and I've seen someone already told you that, and you ignored it, in the very first edits of this page — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.180.137.99 (talk) 20:24, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

... which appears to be an ancient Indiana Jones, a man's family is taken from him by Nazi raiders... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.237.234.149 (talk) 21:07, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

... which appears to be an ancient pikachu, a man's family is taken from him by bulbasaur raiders... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.15.237.50 (talk) 14:36, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Japanese cinema?[edit]

Why is this film tagged: "This article is supported by the Japanese cinema task force."? I can understand the British cinema connection due to the writer/director and a batch of the actors, but Japanese? Please clarify. Thank you, Wordreader (talk) 18:17, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]