Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Altovis

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. —Korath (Talk) 01:03, Mar 20, 2005 (UTC)

Altovis

Wikipedia is not for advertisments or consumer advice warnings--nixie 06:19, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• Keep. —Markaci 2005-03-14 T 10:19 Z
• While I don't like the tone of the article or the overdose of external links, I think the topic should deserve a mention (if only because people reading about the drug may want to get more info on it from WP). So remove superfluous material, mark as stub and keep. Radiant! 12:16, Mar 14, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep products backed by major advertising campaigns. If you are going to imply something is fradulent, you need external links to back it up. Kappa 12:39, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Added a few minor updates to the article from the available sales information. -- Arevich 20:42, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • • Comment -- Removed fraud allegations from article. Fraud should probably not be alleged unless there has been a conviction in a court of law. Arevich 21:02, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, cleanup and expand. Megan1967 05:16, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.