Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stedelen
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS. dbenbenn | talk 14:47, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Stedelen[edit]
Non-notable dead witch. Orphaned page. humblefool® 02:28, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Stedelen's trial is part of university lectures today. Keep, but note that this link says he was a man. (It's The Crying Game of notable witch trials, people!) :) Samaritan 06:09, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Delete. There's nothing notable about this witch or his trial compared to any of the other medieval witch trials. --Angr 07:34, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, needs expansion. Megan1967 01:17, 2 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Weak delete. Article doesn't establish notability. Willing to reconsider if expanded. Wile E. Heresiarch 06:41, 2 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Article doesn't even claim notability, let alone establish it. —Korath (Talk) 12:53, Feb 3, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Such trials in general are notable, but nothing here to show that this was an outstanding example. Edeans 04:58, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Comment Stedelen is indeed a man, not a woman. I have modified the article accordingly. Megan1967 03:46, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Strong Keep Why should we not have this figure here?Zantastik 03:59, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Grue 09:46, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Merge with Witch trial unless much more information comes to be included in the present article. Wikityke 19:35, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.