Talk:Yoga

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleYoga has been listed as one of the Philosophy and religion good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 3, 2006WikiProject peer reviewReviewed
April 17, 2007Good article nomineeListed
August 15, 2008Good article reassessmentKept
July 21, 2009Good article reassessmentKept
Current status: Good article

Baum on Yoga[edit]

Why do we care?RegentsPark (comment) 00:39, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Every article needs to be balanced. This page has barely any criticism. In fact, what I added is one of the few critical sentences. WP cares about balance. So should you, RegentsPark. I know you don’t even bother to address me by name.

Instead of an arrogant why do we care? I ask you to engage on a factual editorial level. Reverting is easy- you have reverted my addition of sourced material and language improvements three times without any engagement on the facts.

This is edit warring. In fact, you like the other editor have reverted objective linguistic improvements. The present tense is inappropriate for dated statements, as you should know.--Wuerzele (talk) 00:51, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Wuerzele: Balance is fine but why do we care about a psychiatrist's comments on Yoga? I don't see any point in including this in the article. Please note that it is incumbent on you to seek consensus if your edits are reverted. Also, apologies for not addressing you by name. I didn't think it necessary because I assumed you would be watching this article. RegentsPark (comment) 01:00, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"Antonia Baum" is not notable enough to have her own Wikipedia page, so her opinion is WP:UNDUE and irrelevant to the article. WP:BALANCE does not bind here. And calling others arrogant wouldn't help your cause either. --WikiLinuz {talk} 01:20, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Also, [...] cursed yoga [...] in your revision is just unencyclopedic and bad English. --WikiLinuz {talk} 01:28, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
As for the 'past tense', it suggests different states of affair in comparison to the specific years added, where this is not the intention of the text. And regarding edit-warring: that's precisely what Wuerzele is doing. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 03:32, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]