Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2005 April 21

April 21

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 16:39, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Category:Windows web development software

I've re-categorized the articles under Category:HTML editors. The term "web development software" is too broad. I can say text editor is also a "web development software". There are not too many HTML editors, so there is no need to split the category into sub-category according to OS. minghong 18:17, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 16:39, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Category:Mac OS web development software

I've re-categorized the articles under Category:HTML editors. The term "web development software" is too broad. I can say text editor is also a "web development software". There are not too many HTML editors, so there is no need to split the category into sub-category according to OS. minghong 18:17, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 16:39, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Category:Battles of the Nez Perce War

Members have been recategorised under Category:Battles of the Nez Percé War. Urhixidur 18:02, 2005 Apr 21 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 16:39, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Category:Nez Perce tribe

Members have been recategorised under Category:Nez Percé tribe. Urhixidur 18:02, 2005 Apr 21 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 16:12, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Category:Seven Wonders of the World

As it stands, this category is a re-creation of the previously deleted Category:Wonders of the World. See Wikipedia:Categories_for_deletion/Category:Wonders_of_the_World2 for the deletion discussion.

The list of the seven wonders of the ancient world is the only widely accepted list of wonders of the world. The consensus previously reached was that any other list is arbitrary and POV. I think this category should be renamed Category:Seven Wonders of the Ancient World and restricting it to the seven. Worldtraveller 00:11, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• I completely support your proposal. Postdlf 21:51, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• If there are only seven of them, and they never change, this should be a list, and the category should be deleted. --ssd 04:47, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. A list is better. - Uppland 06:40, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. POV category, and shouldn't it have only seven articles (or maybe eight)? --cesarb 13:39, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• DeleteOliver Chettle 03:02, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep I agree with Postdlf SchmuckyTheCat 20:25, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, only seven possible articles....ever. Seven Wonders of the World is entirely sufficient. Cburnett 16:19, Apr 26, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. List is sufficient. RedWolf 03:13, Apr 27, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. I agree with a list. --Kbdank71 18:20, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 16:39, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Category:Airports of New York City

• To be replaced with a list, as per the talk page discussion. Burgundavia 06:44, Apr 21, 2005 (UTC)
• I agree that this is a good idea David 13:40, 2005 Apr 21 (UTC)
• Waiting a day or two for the list to be created. --Kbdank71 16:39, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

Unused Hockey categories

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 13:32, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Category:Ice hockey player missing international play information

Obsolete and not being used. Kevin Rector (talk) 04:57, Apr 21, 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 13:32, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Category:Ice hockey player missing statistics

Obsolete and not being used. Kevin Rector (talk) 04:57, Apr 21, 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 13:32, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Category:Ice hockey player missing awards

Obsolete and not being used. Kevin Rector (talk) 04:57, Apr 21, 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 13:26, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Category:Unformatted ice hockey player

Obsolete and not being used. Kevin Rector (talk) 04:57, Apr 21, 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 13:26, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Category:Ice hockey player to do

Obsolete and not being used. Kevin Rector (talk) 04:57, Apr 21, 2005 (UTC)

• (for all the hockey categories) Delete, conditional on the successfull deletion of the associated templates. --Azkar 03:14, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 13:26, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Category:FLCL

Only contains one article, FLCL. Any other information on FLCL should just be added to the FLCL article. -℘yrop (talk) 02:56, Apr 21, 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was merge to Category:Journalism --Kbdank71 13:26, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Category:News trade or Category:Journalism

Some articles consider the "news trade" to be a superset of "journalism", the latter being reporting only and the former including non-reporting jobs in support of news publishing and broadcasting. As for what articles belong in these categories, the overlap seems to be between 90%-100%. It just seems confusing to have them both. So let's chuck one, I don't care which. -- Beland 02:10, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• "Journalism" is much more commonly used. Maurreen 02:58, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Agree with Maurreen. Move anything over to journalism that isn't there already and delete "news trade". Postdlf 21:52, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I agree with Maurreen and Postdif, the catagory Journalism is a valid and established one, whereas "news trade" is not. "News trade" is an invented and I think dubious category. There's an article called news trade which is itself a "totally disputed" stub and one which should not serve as some meta-catagory covering all of media and journalism. I reject "news trade" as the basis for any -- template, categroy and article, the concept is seriously out of wack. Calicocat 20:37, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.