Talk:Be/X-ray binary
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Pronuncuation & etymology[edit]
Pronunciation? Etymology? -- Tim Starling 07:08 Apr 16, 2003 (UTC)
Pronunciation as separate letters, "Bee ee". Etymology is quite simple: Be X-ray binaries are X-ray binaries. The donor is a Be star. I think the "Be" is the only non-trivial thing here, and I will write at least a stub on Be stars in future. -- Caid Raspa 08:44 Apr 16, 2003 (UTC)
Requested move 13 July 2014[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved. Jenks24 (talk) 09:14, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Be X-ray binaries → Be/X-ray binary – Per WP:SINGULAR the title should be the singular form. Furthermore a Google scholar search [1] shows that the more commonly-used form includes a slash between "Be" and "X-ray", and in such cases WP:SUBPAGE#Slashes in article titles indicates that the article should be named accordingly. 77.57.25.250 (talk) 23:11, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Survey[edit]
- Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with
*'''Support'''or*'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
- Comment MOS:SLASH avoid slashes when possible. As the non-slashed form exists in literature, then we have a non-slashed form that can be used, without causing confusion with subpages. The proposed title can be created as a redirect to the current one (well, the singular, Be X-ray binary). -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 03:35, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
- MOS:SLASH appears to apply to using a slash as a conjunction in article text rather than how we should represent terms whose most common form includes the slash in article titles. WP:COMMONNAME is more relevant here, as is WP:SUBPAGE#Slashes in article titles. Also here it aids clarity: it makes it more obvious that "Be" is not the verb "be". 77.57.25.250 (talk) 07:39, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
- Support; WP:COMMONNAME says we should use the title with the slash, since it is in more common usage. StringTheory11 (t • c) 17:13, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
Discussion[edit]
- Any additional comments:
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.