Talk:Wye River Memorandum

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Move to Wikisource[edit]

Looks like just a full transcript of a political memorandum... AlbinoMonkey (Talk) 13:40, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Updated and turned into article[edit]

Recent edits and elimination of the diplomatic "bobble-di-gook" with additional links and categories added makes this into a very good NPOV article for now. IZAK 08:26, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Added Pollard issue[edit]

I've added the Jonathan Pollard issue to the intro because it was major news at the time and almost caused the deal not to be signed. I think it's very NPOV but feel free to reword as necesary.

The Machine 15:03, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Wye River Memorandum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:06, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Wye River Memorandum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:52, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 18 April 2017[edit]

Change dead link in external links section from:

http://www.state.gov/www/regions/nea/981023_interim_agmt.html

To official archive link:

https://2001-2009.state.gov/p/nea/rls/22694.htm

because it is clearly the official archived version of the page from the dead link. If further confirmation is desired, see the archive dot org version of the dead link as it appeared on and before April 26, 2013. Clarification: please nevertheless place in the page the state dot gov archive location of the item. That is now and for the future, in effect, the item itself, while the archive dot org copy is a third party's copy. They're a very good third party but still a third party. I am only elaborating in order to be very clear about my request. As far as I know and imagine, there is not and will not be any controversy over this request. Minopret (talk) 15:24, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 DoneIVORK Discuss 00:56, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]