User talk:Fredbauder/Notes
Proposed deletion of Scoti[edit]
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Scoti, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process.
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Shawnpoo (talk) 11:20, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Internet dynamics[edit]
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Internet dynamics. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Internet dynamics. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:16, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Pit Bull. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pit Bull. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:11, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
Conflict of Interest/Advertising/Contentiousness[edit]
I completely agree with your assessment of Objective3000.
Any external gambling website to which links are provided, other than to his qfit, blackjackincolor, blackjack-scam, and others, is deleted by him. His goal on WP is to provide a billboard for his highly priced CV software. Look, in particular, at "Card counting". Of the first 9 references, 5 are to his various cites. Of the first 16, I think 9 are to his various cites. They all prominently display CV software. Indeed, his profile refers ONLY to his CV software.
I’m new, but these external links should be replaced by links to primary sources. His websites simply regurgitate the work of others. I’m happy to help provide the primary sources as alternative references in this regard.
I also highly doubt his claims of familiarity with the true experts in the gambling field. He's been on WP only since 2007 and many of his statements are inaccurate. Plus, if it matters, his writing is abysmally poor and incomprehensible because of the jargon he's coined to provide himself an aura of expertise.
He should be barred from WP as SEVERE conflict of interest/marketing motivated. And his contentiousness and meanness should not be tolerated. He's not a scholar, but a businessman and he uses WP as low cost advertising.
PhilippeMaurice (talk) 14:48, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
- This appears to be a sockpuppet, probably of Mk5384, who was community banned and has used sockpuppets in the past.Objective3000 (talk) 17:36, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
- Confirmed Sockpuppet of Drlesmgolden Objective3000 (talk) 01:18, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
Dairy Management Inc. article merged with Dairy Promotions Program article[edit]
Fred -
I am an employee of Dairy Management, Inc. Thank you for recently posting the information about the Dairy Promotions Program Content on the Dairy Management, Inc. page. We are pleased to see the content and that all of the information is accurate. Thank you very much.
I would like to bring to your attention an inaccuracy in the opening description and hope you can help us. The opening description line states that DMI is “an offshoot of the USDA” which unfortunately is not an accurate statement.
We actually are not an offshoot of the USDA nor considered a subsidiary of theirs in any way.
Can we please change the opening sentence to reflect a more accurate description of our organization? I would suggest the following:
Dairy Management Inc.™ (DMI) is a private, non-profit corporation which was established and run by America's dairy farmers to unify national and local dairy promotion efforts.
This information is supported by an article from Prairie Farmer (part of Farm Progress Companies – Agriculture’s Information Leader) which also clarifies the USDA inaccuracy.
Please advise as we would like to ensure that the accurate description of our organization is posted as soon as possible. Thank you very much.