Dear Savethemooses[edit]

HEY! Just what do you mean by, "the article is worse than the movie itself?!" The entry is not THAT bad! And just because you don't like Romances (i.e. DRAMA) doesn't mean that the movie needs to be deleted or demeaned as an entry --- you need to recall the idiom, "to each his (or her) own (whichever be the case)." That is to say, everyone has different tastes in the movie world: there are 'guy' flicks which men like, 'chick' flicks which women like, and co-ed movies which even transvestites like...this movie entry (The Long Lost Son) just happens to be the female variety of entertainment. Thus, i respectfully ask that you repeal your statement or repent --- there is no wrath worse than God's over sinners, with the exception of women's wrath naturally! Sincerely, Greg Alan Zimmerman 04:13, 29 April 2008 (UTC). P.S. And, by the way, I strongly believe that we ought to SAVE THE WOLVES!!!

Welcome to Wikipedia![edit]

Hello Savethemooses, welcome to Wikipedia!

Here are some tips:

Read the Tutorial, How to edit a page and the Manual of Style.
Create a User page.
Sign your posts on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~).
Read the Policies and guidelines.
Add yourself to the New user log.
Ask questions at the Village pump or Help desk.
Be bold!
Use the Show preview button
Provide an Edit summary.

If you feel a change is needed, feel free to make it yourself! Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone (yourself included) can edit any article by following the Edit this page link. Wikipedia convention is to be bold and not be afraid of making mistakes. If you're not sure how editing works, have a look at How to edit a page, or try out the Sandbox to test your editing skills.

If, for some reason, you are unable to fix a problem yourself, feel free to ask someone else to do it. Wikipedia has a vibrant community of contributors who have a wide range of skills and specialties, and many of them would be glad to help. As well as the wiki community pages there are IRC Channels, where you are more than welcome to ask for assistance.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me on my talk page. Thanks and happy editing, Alphax ^τεχ 10:37, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Barry Manilow on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Ucanlookitup 02:03, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Barry_manilow.PNG[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Barry_manilow.PNG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:57, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Miracle at the Meadowlands FAC[edit]

While I'm flattered that you think so, and I definitely see it as a future featured article, it's nowhere near ready yet. Daniel Case 05:47, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

BENSON IS BETTER THAN YOU![edit]

Save the Mooses is now promoted to co-prophet (with Crazyswordsman). TELL ALL! Also, tell them that BENSON is better than them. I think they're starting to forget.

LOOOOOOOOL[edit]

Thanks for the laugh: I laughed so hard at this that I had people at the library looking around in alarm. Milto LOL pia 16:32, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism[edit]

2007[edit]

December[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to The Wallet of Kai Lung. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jhfireboy Talk 23:10, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, that was extremely fast. Good job. Did you just happen across it right after I made the edit? --Savethemooses (talk) 23:13, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Clyde Bellecourt. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Brandt Luke Zorn (talk) 10:06, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to clarify[edit]

That 99% of my ~220 edits to Wikipedia have been useful grammar, spelling and pov corrections. Thank you. --Savethemooses (talk) 10:27, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Probably best for me to reply via email - will do so. -- sannse (talk) 21:06, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Or not, no mail set. I'm happy to talk it over on IRC or wherever though. Also, you should read this, which funnily enough you commented on at the time -- sannse (talk) 21:12, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lookie Lookie[edit]

I have a cookie.70.57.209.59 (talk) 11:25, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Dane Cook. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Hotcrocodile (talk) 23:58, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your recent edits to Jeff Zucker have been reverted as they could be seen to be defamatory or potentially libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Epeefleche (talk) 09:12, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Rebirth (Lil Wayne album) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Tommy²⁰¹⁰ 07:57, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011[edit]

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Dick Wolf, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Nlu (talk) 16:54, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I had a source that I believed to be valid. I have since found that the podcast was inaccurate. Please remove this warning or I will contact the Better Business Bureau. --Savethemooses (talk) 04:13, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:HBNichols13[edit]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as User:HBNichols13, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jasper Deng (talk) 03:58, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 04:05, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Savethemooses (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

A majority of my edits are constructive spelling, grammar and pov corrections. The occasional unconstructive edit shouldn't warrant an indefinite block. A shorter block period would be more appropriate. Savethemooses (talk) 17:48, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

"Indefinite" does not mean "infinite" - it means until we're certain that the unconstructive edits will never happen again. Let us know when that happens as per WP:GAB (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 18:13, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.