Talk:Hussein bin Ali, King of Hejaz

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

His son, Abdullah I was then Emir (not King) of Transjordan. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.173.208.60 (talk) 18:12, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sharif or Sherif[edit]

Sherif Hussein's bio page has him a Sherif of Mecca, whereas Sharif of Meccapage has a differnent spelling; is it possible to reconcile the differences? Nobs 17:28, 1 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This sentence: "This aggravated his conflict with Ibn Saud, with whom he had fought before WWI on the side of the Ottomans in 1910", is ambiguous. Who was on the "the side of the Ottomans, Sherif Hussein or Ibn Saud?. thx.Nobs01 16:49, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Or both of them?

Page name?[edit]

I am planning to make a large number of redirects to this page. However, I want to make sure we have the right page name before I get started. Should it be Sherif or Sharif? ibn Ali or bin Ali? Should we even call him Sharif at all (there's more than one Sharif Hussein ibn Ali, anyway), or should we call him Hussein ibn Ali, Emir of Mecca or ..., King of the Hijaz or something? - Nat Krause 18:30, 10 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The whole question of honorifics and titles in article titles is difficult. I myself prefer to have just the NAME and leave any titles for the article itself to explain. Otherwise you'll have people arguing about whether the article should be Muhammad or Prophet Muhammad or Apostle of God Muhammad, or whatever.
If we just do the name, we're going to have to have a disambiguation page, since there must be millions of Muslims, alive and deceased, named Hussein ibn Ali or Hussein bin Ali -- or Husseyn bin Ali, Hossein bin Ali, or other transliterations. Zora 20:55, 12 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The NC prefers (actually directs) to use the highest title. Thus, he should be King of Hejaz (or how the kingdom's name is correctly written). 217.140.193.123 19:47, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

For one thing, it's not clear to me that "King of Hejaz" is really a higher rank than "Sharif of Mecca", since the latter is partly a religious title while the former is purely secular. For another, the naming conventions also state, "Where a monarch has reigned over a number of states, use the most commonly associated ones." I think it's pretty clear that Hussein bin Ali is better known as a Sharif than as a King. For this reason, I am moving the page back to its previous location. - Nat Krause 02:08, 2 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

If you regard Sharif as a religious title, then you should apply NC parts that deal with religious figures, such as clerics. If Sharif however is a monarch, it is clearly lower than king, and should be trated as such, contrary to your assertion. As Hussein himself assumed the kingly title after being a number of years the sharif, they obviously themselves regarded king higher. (Btw, I found a piece of text which says that Sharif of Mecca was a secular title: "In 1924 Hussein abdicated his secular titles to his eldest son, Ali bin Hussein, who was to become the last Grand Sharif".) However, his Caliph title would be yet higher, but that could be problematic, as we are not to endorse pretensions. Btw, the number of years a person was known as something does not count, it is superseded by the principle "use highest title". Otherwise, we would have Edward, Prince of Wales instead of Edward VII of the United Kingdom. Therefore your claim that "is better known as Sharif than as king" is worthless, as far as it is based on number of years he was known as one and of the other. Btw, the monarchical heading actually should not have a title if Hussein was king. Arrigo 10:31, 4 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Burial place?[edit]

In the article, it is mentioned that he is buried in Jerusalem. On the summary, it says Royal Mausoleum in Baghdad. Which is it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.229.63.9 (talk) 14:21, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lineage[edit]

This section was removed as out of context, apparently in arabic. would need links or an explanation, otherwise perhaps this can be an external linkMercurywoodrose (talk) 07:01, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

al-Husayn ibn `Ali ibn Muhammad ibn `Abd al-Mu`in ibn `Awn ibn Muhsin ibn `Abd Allah ibn al-Husayn ibn `Abd Allah ibn al-Hasan ibn Muhammad Abi Numayy II ibn Barakat II ibn Muhammad I ibn Barakat I ibn al-Hasan ibn `Ajlan ibn Rumaythah ibn Muhammad Abi Numayy I ibn Abi Sa`d al-Hasan ibn `Ali al-Akbar ibn Qatadah ibn Idris ibn Muta`in ibn `Abd al-Karim ibn `Isa ibn al-Husayn ibn Sulayman ibn `Ali ibn `Abd Allah al-Akbar ibn Muhammad ath-Tha'ir ibn Musa II ibn `Abd Allah ash-Shaykh as-Salih ibn Musa al-Jawn ibn `Abd Allah al-Mahd ibn al-Hasan al-Muthanna ibn al-Hasan ibn `Ali ibn Abi Talib.[1][2]

References

  1. ^ "The Hashemite Family Tree". kinghussein.gov.jo.
  2. ^ "The Hashemite Family Tree". kinghussein.gov.jo (in Arabic).

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hussein bin Ali, Sharif of Mecca. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:20, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Royal Ark[edit]

The third reference source is Royal Ark but it states that Hussein was born in Mecca and his mother's name was Salha. Andres (talk) 21:57, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Abdullah I ibn Hussein ibn Ali writes in his memoirs that his father's grandmother (i.e., Ali's mother) was Salihah bint Gharam. Royal Ark incorrectly identifies Salihah as Ali's wife. --Axiom292 (talk) 03:27, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:51, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 21 December 2021[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved - Consensus that this specific person should be known by their highest title.(non-admin closure) FOARP (talk) 09:03, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Hussein bin Ali, Sharif of MeccaHussein bin Ali, King of Hejaz – The kingship was the highest position he held and would therefore appear to be the proper title. Векочел (talk) 01:39, 21 December 2021 (UTC) — Relisting. VR talk 07:40, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support although Sherif/Sharif has an edge as commonname, that very likely has to do with the amount of literature concerning his dealings with Britain such as the McMahon Hussein correspondence before he was recognized by the allies as King of the Hejaz (should include "the", I think) at the end of 1916. There is a separate page for the Sharif title itself so maybe no redirect/no disambiguation is correct.Selfstudier (talk) 10:30, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.