User talk:Hidaspal

Hello Hidaspal and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.

Here are some tips to help you get started:

To sign your posts (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~~~~ (4 tildes).
Try the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the test area.
If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk
Follow the Wikipedia:Simplified Ruleset
Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
Remember Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!

Good luck!

Hello and welcome :)[edit]

Hi! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I noticed that you created a page at Ruga saying only "See Rua." We have redirects for this purpose; please take a look at Wikipedia:Redirect. I've fixed this particular one for you. Thanks! — Timwi 16:51, 6 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Reply[edit]

No problem. The work on ruga, however, was done by User:Timwi. Anyway, it's good to have you, and keep up the nice work. Best, [[User:Meelar|Meelar (talk)]] 17:28, 6 Jul 2004 (UTC)

physics wikiproject[edit]

I'd like to invite you to join the Wikipedia:WikiProject Physics, add the talk page to your watch-list, and add your name to the list of participants at Wikipedia:WikiProject Physics/Participants. linas 05:44, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Total re-write of the main Physics page is in progess[edit]

You might like to join us at Physics/wip where a total re-write of the main Physics page is in progess. At present we're discussing the lead paragraphs for the new version, and how Physics should be defined. I've posted here because you are on the Physics Project participant list. --MichaelMaggs 08:04, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review for the list of baryons[edit]

Hi,

I noticed that you had a Ph.D in particle physics, so I wondered you could head over the List of baryons and Talk:List of baryons pages a give some feedback. I'm currently trying to bring that article to Featured List status, but I'm not a particle physicist so I probably made half a dozen mistakes. Any help will be appreciated. Thanks in advance. Headbomb (talk · contribs) 21:36, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, sorry for the late answer, I have not logged in for 2 years, it seems. I'll have a look on those pages, but first on the tutorials. :-) Hidaspal (talk) 13:35, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I got lucky that you decided to log in then.

BTW, the list of baryons has been peer review already, and has been through the featured list nomination once (failed). I rewrote some things, so it stills needs feedback and it will still be appreciated. Comment on Talk:List of baryons. Headbomb (ταλκ · κοντριβς) 14:31, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Physics participation[edit]

You received this message because your were on the old list of WikiProject Physics participants.

On 2008-06-25, the WikiProject Physics participant list was rewritten from scratch as a way to remove all inactive participants, and to facilitate the coordination of WikiProject Physics efforts. The list now contains more information, is easier to browse, is visually more appealing, and will be maintained up to date.

If you still are an active participant of WikiProject Physics, please add yourself to the current list of WikiProject Physics participants. Headbomb {ταλκ – WP Physics: PotW} 16:03, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case[edit]

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Doncsecz for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. I don't think you are related and I mentioned that in the SPI (but it would be remiss of me not to inform you). Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 13:21, 9 September 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.117.219.1 (talk) [reply]

I am not a sockpuppet. [1] [2] Hidaspal (talk) 14:43, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Negro (candy)[edit]

The article Negro (candy) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable, obscure Eastern European candy, unreffed, orphan article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CaptainScreebo ^Parley! 13:54, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Public benefit organization may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

'''Public benefit organization''' ({{lang-hu|Közhasznú szervezet}} is a term used in [[Hungary]] introduced on 1 January 1997 by the [[

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:47, 2 November 2014 (UTC) OK, I have fixed it, Thanks BracketBot. } Hidaspal (talk) 10:00, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:18, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]