Talk:Sea kayak

Canoeing and Kayaking B‑class (inactive)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canoeing and Kayaking, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Canoeing and KayakingWikipedia:WikiProject Canoeing and KayakingTemplate:WikiProject Canoeing and KayakingCanoeing and Kayaking articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Untitled[edit]

I was reading this entry and thought perhaps a mention should be made of a baidarka with its forked bow, so I added an entry for baidarka. The entry is so brief that perhaps it belongs in Wiktionary. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JamesReilly (talk • contribs) February 18, 2005

Thanks. I added a wikilnk to your page (add tweaked the page as well). -- Gnetwerker 23:40, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sources[edit]

I've expanded the article, but I'm way too lazy to actually go out and find citations for everything. Help! -- Gnetwerker 23:40, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This page vis. Kayak[edit]

(from Kayak talk page): There is a lot of confusion and redundancy among the various kayaking pages. The History section here and the one in Sea Kayak overlap, but contain some distinct and some inconsistent information. I would like to re-organize all of the kayaking pages, and want to float some ideas and get some feedback here first. Disclosure: I am primarily a sea kayaker, though I did a fair bit of whitewater kayaking in the 1970s, when it was a very different sport than today.

One idea is to move most/all of the History to this page (Kayak), and then have two overview sections, one by type of construction, and one by use, with the second one primarily pointing to the more-specific pages. If a page doesn't exist, we could either stub it or include the info here. We would cover the primary design issues (which are covered in more detail in Sea kayak) here, and perhaps re-iterate key points in the individual sub-articles.

Another idea is to bulk the Kayak page up with most of the info on specific kinds of boats and redirect the individual boat pages there. I think this might lead to too large a page, but felt I should suggest it. There are probably other ideas as well. If you care, let's hear from you (on the Kayak talk page please)! -- Gnetwerker 23:19, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Classes[edit]

I removed the part "classes" again, as this is describing an arbitrary classification, that I dont recognise. Especially the hard limits on size of different features is strange. Another example is that the kayak I have falls into the proposed class "expedition", but it has too small storage to manage more than 4-5 days of unsopported travelling: if I were to go for a real multi-week expedition, I would take a much larger (=wider) kayak. I think that there should be some sort of source of provenance for the proposed classification before it is reinserted. Mossig (talk) 10:14, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Broadening our horizons[edit]

Kayaking is an incredibly dynamic sport, with many different forms. There are a multitude of related subjects that should be included. I'll try and flesh out some sections, and edit in others. Of course my vantage point is purely as expedition sea kayaker and surf kayaker, and thereby limited to an extent.

Equipment Section* I fleshed out some generalized boat discriptors in the design section.

safety section* I removed a comment on the difficulty of rolling a heavily loaded boat. I personally belive a loaded boat, is easier to roll. The added weight in the hull of the boat lowers the overall Center Of Gravity (COG). To successfully perfom a roll, the paddler must succeed in brining his upper body, above the hull. The lower the center of gravity, the easier to get ones torso, head and body, up on top of it.

Cheers, I like the entry so far. WestCoast222 (talk) 08:37, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dimensional clarifications[edit]

For Sea kayak#Dimensions:

{{convert|20|to|24|in|mm}} ({{convert|57|-|76|cm|abbr=on|disp=or}}^{[clarification needed]})
- {{convert|20|to|24|in|mm cm}}, 20 to 24 inches (510 to 610 mm; 51 to 61 cm)?
{{convert|23|to|24|in|mm}} ({{convert|66|-|76|cm|abbr=on|disp=or}}^{[clarification needed]})
- {{convert|23|to|24|in|mm cm}}, 23 to 24 inches (580 to 610 mm; 58 to 61 cm)?
{{convert|20|to|23|in|mm}} ({{convert|56|-|63.5|cm|abbr=on|disp=or}}^{[clarification needed]})
- {{convert|20|to|23|in|mm cm}}, 20 to 23 inches (510 to 580 mm; 51 to 58 cm)?
{{convert|11|to|13|in|mm}} ({{convert|33|-|40|cm|abbr=on|disp=or}}^{[clarification needed]})
- {{convert|11|to|13|in|mm cm}}, 11 to 13 inches (280 to 330 mm; 28 to 33 cm)?

What is meant here? Peter Horn User talk 20:48, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Sea kayak/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

It's an excellent description, and is almost at the good article stage, but desperately needs references and citations. It's a fantastic article covering most of the bases, but needs addition of more sourced material and references. Bennyboyz3000 11:58, 11 August 2007

Last edited at 08:30, 30 August 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 05:39, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Sea kayak. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:37, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]