Talk:Brugg

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

from VfD:

Pumpie just doesn't seem to understund that his Babelfish translations of my German articles is simply junk. Delete. --Voyager ch 19:33, 11 Oct 2004 (UTC)

  • Keep. Content is worth keeping. The article does need work to turn the transation into something properly understandable. It needs attention rather than deleting. MarkS 20:22, 11 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. I've tidied up the content and removed the translation boilerplate - a process which took no more than 2 minutes.--Tomheaton 21:56, 11 Oct 2004 (UTC)

end moved discussion

Updating Brugg[edit]

I am going to work on transfering information and a number of public domain images from the German-language entry on Brugg in a couple of weeks. I made a very quick update to the page which may or may not require improvement. The information is fairly basic and includes some information of note, such as the fact that the Aar[e] meets with the Limmat and Reuss within the vicinity of the town and the connections to the Habsburgs, both of which were previously missing. I also found it rather peculiar that only the High German word for bridge was used. The people here speak Swiss German, and Brugg literally means bridge in Swiss German. Either way, I do plan on overhauling the page given the amount of information currently available in [German]. --Ami in CH (talk) 00:17, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I have started. I have already copied in the complete translation of the introduction and have begun translating the following sections. --Ami in CH (talk) 11:28, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I will start working on this when I return to the US soon. I hadn't realized just how long the German-language page was. As soon as I did, I decided to leave it until I had time. I will have said time once I am back in the States. --Ami in CH (talk) 20:08, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I am going to post as I translate. The additions will not be perfect, but I will tweak them as time goes by. I feel that it is more important to make and post progess than to wait until everything is perfect. The repetition existed on the German-language page. I will work on that when everything is done.--Ami in CH (talk) 21:23, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
24.63.218.7 is me. I didn't notice that I had been logged out as I had been using the same window!--Ami in CH (talk) 22:10, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

good work Dribblingscribe (talk) 10:17, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Brugg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:03, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Brugg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:41, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Brugg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:51, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]