Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Detroit diesel 50

Poorly written and unformatted orphan page about an obscure type of bus engine. -- Scott Burley 05:16, Oct 1, 2004 (UTC)

Neither reason you mention is a valid reason for deleteion, suggest you review the the guidelines. Since this article was less that one hour old before getting VFD'd, I say keep and improve. Please don't bite the newbies by trying to delete their first articles. -- Netoholic @ 05:47, 2004 Oct 1 (UTC)
- Sorry, guess my trigger finger got itchy. Looks good now. -- Scott Burley 22:52, Oct 1, 2004 (UTC)
Keep. Can't see any valid reason to delete. [[User:Rhymeless|Rhymeless | (Methyl Remiss)]] 06:47, 1 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Keep - valid topic, but the article needs to be unstubbed -- Chris 73 Talk 07:21, Oct 1, 2004 (UTC)
Keep - valid topic, no reason to delete --Rlandmann 07:28, 1 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Keep - One person's obscure = another's great interest. It's a huge strength of the Wikipedia that it contains articles on so many things. --Jll 11:51, 1 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Keep. -- Necrothesp 13:34, 1 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Keep and please stop deletion trolling. The Recycling Troll 15:19, 1 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Keep and expand. In fact, I'm amazed that "Detroit Diesel" comes up as a red link! - Lucky 6.9 16:05, 1 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Keep. Legitimate topic. — Gwalla | Talk 17:35, 1 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Since concensus seems clear, I propose removing this listing within 24 hours unless there are any objections. -- Netoholic @ 16:25, 2004 Oct 1 (UTC)