Talk:Whipsnade Zoo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Whipsnade are editing their own article to remove criticsm[edit]

edited by 195.195.251.246 (talk) at 15:29, 28 September 2009.

whois 195.195.251.246 netname:ZOOLOGICAL-SOL-01 descr:Zoological Society of London descr:Regent's Park, London NW1 4RY

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.103.163.11 (talk) 21:28, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is a statement of the entry fee really a "point of view"? Brequinda 20:18, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Not everything in Wikipedia needs to be a POV, it just needs to have a Neutral POV Rojomoke 15:12, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed move to "Whipsnade Zoo"[edit]

Someone renamed this article as "ZSL Whipsnade Zoo", but the change was reverted because it is Wikipedia policy to use the common name of the subject.

Before the official name of the zoo was changed to Whipsnade Wild Animal Park it was commonly known as Whipsnade Zoo. In fact this name is still as common according to Google hits: 60100 for Whipsnade Zoo (including 19600 for ZSL Whipsnade Zoo), 44300 for Whipsnade Wild Animal Park, 289 for Whipsnade Park Zoo, 131 for Whipsnade Zoological Park, and 4160 for Whipsnade Wildlife Park. I think it is bound to become increasingly common, and only time will tell whether the ZSL prefix catches on. Therefore, unless there are ojections before Friday, I intend to rename the article as "Whipsnade Zoo".

I was amused by the following editorial in the Dunstable Gazette (7 March 2007, page 12).

JonH 13:46, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]


No objections received. This move can only be done by an administrator, so I have left a request at Wikipedia:Requested moves. JonH 13:17, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Page moved, per request. -GTBacchus(talk) 21:10, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It was a pointless name change in all, quite right that nobody acknowledges the change, it is still refered to by us, the staff, as 'the zoo'. It even still has the same damn sign above the gates and the park entrance. Freaky_dragonlady —Preceding unsigned comment added by Freaky dragonlady (talkcontribs) 18:52, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Visiting Whipsnade[edit]

Anyone thinking of visiting this very impressive attraction should try to avoid Dunstable town centre which is a nightmare to negotiate. In particular if you approach from the north on the A5 I suggest you take the first right at the major traffic light junction rather than following the brown sign. This avoids all the pedestrian crossings which disrupt the traffic flow and it is no further and certainly quicker. Of course you have to take a left at the next major junction to rejoin your route.

Visitors can also stop by Dunstable Downs to watch kite flying and gliders.


F_DL *As yes, if visiting the zoo make sure to visit the Tree Cathedral in Whipsnade *village (leave the zoo and turn right, and the left turn 'Tree Catherdral' sign *will be around the second bend) and make sure to visit the kite spot.

  • To reach the kite flying and glider viweing spot, leaving the zoo turn right and *continue to a small roundabout just outside Whipsnade village. Turn left and *after a minute or two of foresty country road you will face the beautiful view *of the aylesbury plains below, and parking is the first and second left roads *off.
  • Though I do wish to complain about the kite spot, if any locals are on wiki.
  • Only a year or two ago the kite spot was a large area of the chilterns wonderful *for kites, with parking and a small hut to buy icecreams, toys, wildlife books *and kites. Then the Dunstable Council and the Wildlife Trust put up pay machines *in the shabby car parks, tore down the old building and put up a big greenhouse
  • (it looks like a greenhouse and in the morning it's blinding if you're driving) *with its own car parks (with pay machines). The inside contains an expansive *cafe and overpriced nick-nacks you could buy at any day-out place.
  • Rip-off.
  • My whinge is over. Freaky_dragonlady

81.86.144.210 15:15, 5 September 2007 (UTC) 5th Sept 07[reply]

Images[edit]

Images of animals in a zoo are much like pictures of animals taken anywhere. It would be much better to give more prominence to the zoo infrastructure, buildings , enclosures etc which are specific to this particular zoo. Lumos3 (talk) 22:28, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Here, here! Donlammers (talk) 12:49, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Inconsistency between sections[edit]

In one part of the article, it says that the zoo has 2955 animals, but in the categories list of zoos, it is italicised, where the definition of this is that the zoo contains >5000 animals. Should this be corrected? 130.246.132.178 (talk) 13:05, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]