Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Broadfield

Broadfield was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was keep

Suburb of "Crawly", article created in May, +NPOV tag for looking like an ad in June, that's it. One wonders why it wasn't VfDed in June. Delete for Ad and non-notability. -Vina 20:41, 22 Sep 2004 (UTC)

• Delete. Real estate ad, non-notable suburb. — Gwalla | Talk 21:26, 22 Sep 2004 (UTC)
• Keep and cleanup - if places in the USA that have about 1 resident are worthy of articles, major suburbs should get them also. -- Graham ☺ | Talk 22:12, 22 Sep 2004 (UTC)
• Delete for advertising. It has been in search of cleaners for a long time. No one wants to delete a real place, but a housing development isn't a town or village -- it's an ad. Geogre 00:30, 23 Sep 2004 (UTC)
• Keep. Cleanup if necessary. One of 13 formal neighborhoods of Crawley, used in addresses--5 or 6 other neighborhoods of Crawley have articles. Seems to also be an election district. We have dozens, if not hundreds, of articles on US cities' neighborhoods that aren't formal enuf to be used in addresses--deleting this would be US-centric. We even have articles on individual streets in New York (much to my chagrin). Niteowlneils 03:04, 25 Sep 2004 (UTC)

• Keep--It's a place, not an advert. --A Brit Abroad 08:25, 26 Sep 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.