Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Musixzone

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - deleted - SimonP 15:49, May 14, 2005 (UTC)

Musixzone

Non-notable website. 46 hits on google for Musixzone. Does not pass Alexa test either. The same user that created this page User:217.218.197.9 also spammed several articles for various artists claiming that musixzone was their "official site" --DropDeadGorgias (talk) 18:05, May 6, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete abusive linkspam. Samaritan 19:11, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable, website promo. Megan1967 03:37, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
• Wait , i am one of musixzone's team , this website start working about 2~3 month , this is a non commercial project , i believe you can help us to start open source music community . please Don't delete this article . :) An unsigned comment from new user User:Nendoke.
  • "Wait" is not a valid VFD vote. Please see Wikipedia:Deletion policy and familiarize yourself with the procedures for VFD. In the meantime, please stop adding links to this site into music articles until this debate is resolved. --DropDeadGorgias (talk) 18:32, May 9, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. We are not here to help you start an open music source community. Soundguy99 01:53, 10 May 2005 (UTC)

• OK 1- we are not spammer , 2- open source music is legal , users just listen to music ( they can't save Or Burn Them ) , 3- I will stop add musixzone links to WikipediA ,

TNX & Excuse me for every thing , you can delete this article ,--Nendoke 02:16, 10 May 2005 (UTC) .

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.