Talk:Bridgeport, Chicago

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Demographics[edit]

User:152.163.100.65 is deluded in believing that there are no blacks residing in the Bridgeport Community Area of Chicago. The facts are in the census data. U.S. Census data for the year 2000 (including racial breakdowns) for Bridgeport can be found at the following sources:

--Gerry 13:06, Mar 31, 2005 (UTC)

It is a census error.
Sure it is, weirdo. Speciate 23:23, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well 152.163.100.65, I'll tell my neighbor he's not really black.If he has any questions, I'll have him contact you.
Ryecatcher773 06:51, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

david, angrypollock@sbcglobal.net —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.252.247.222 (talk) 21:23, 11 March 2008 (UTC) i live down the street from the projects on 31st and quinn and there are plenty of blacks there.[reply]

Not wading into the black discussion, but I removed "(besides the Lebanese)" from "Although the Irish are Bridgeport's oldest and most famous ethnic group (besides the Lebanese)". May I also take the opportunity to wish all hipsters a painful and prolonged death. Thank you and have a good day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.167.240.83 (talk) 21:23, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Community area or neighborhood in lede[edit]

Like some other districts in Chicago, Bridgeport can be defined as either a neighborhood or a community area. In my mind, neighborhood is the more apt way to define Bridgeport, since the article is about Bridgeport as a place that people inhabit physically and socially, rather than Bridgeport as a defined unit for long term social research. Non-Chicagoans likely have no idea what a community area is, which makes the lede confusing for most readers. Even for Chicagoans, in my experience, very few think about CAs on a daily basis, and they're mostly used in maps that track some social indicator. The neighborhood, on the other hand, is a constantly used geographical marker. Using the community area in the lede also falsly implies that the neighborhood's boundaries are fixed, when neighborhoods have fuzzy boundaries that change over time. Fitnr (talk) 14:43, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It is both a neighborhood, and one of the cities official 77 community areas, and one of the community areas that is mainly occupied by the neighborhood itself. Both are mentioned in the lead as well as the article and the map in the box (as is the case for all 77 articles regarding Chicago's the community areas) shows the area. I live in Bridgeport and I'm not confused... although our 9th District police station is called Deering, and Deering is the name of an area nowhere near here. This is part of a larger scope in WP Chicago so please understand. By all means you can add something to it, but don't try and fix what isn't broken.Ryecatcher773 (talk) 19:29, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bridgeport or RJD?[edit]

The subject of this article is Bridgeport. "Richard J. Daley is..." The subject of this sentence is Richard J. Daley. This sentence is off-topic, and more appropriate for the RJD article. Also, the political history section of the article does not distinguish between Bridgeport and the 11th ward; they are not the same. Hugh (talk) 21:16, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You're correct, it is about Bridgeport, but this is in the subsection about politicians from Bridgeport (our greatest export), and the Daley family just happens to be the neighborhood's most famous native family... and regarding the Irish base, until the area transitioned to being more Chinese than anything else, it was a heavily Irish neighborhood and the Old Man was heavily connected to the 'Irish Social Club' here, which became his power base and springboard into City Hall. A neighborhood is a place that is the sum of several parts, not a vacuum. Ryecatcher773 (talk) 23:04, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Boundaries with Armour Square?[edit]

The Armour Square, Chicago article gives that neighborhood's southern and eastern boundaries as Pershing Road and the Dan Ryan, respectively, and indicates that it is bordered by Bridgeport to the east. This article indicates that Bridgeport's southern and eastern boundaries are Pershing Road and the Dan Ryan, respectively, and that Bridgeport is bordered by Armour Square to the west. Something is not quite right here... Might this be an aspect of the neighborhood vs. "community area" problem? My impression as a non-local is that the Dan Ryan is the boundary between the Bridgeport and Bronzeville, and that Armour Square (qua neighborhood) is just the part of Bridgeport around Armour Square Park; but I'm not sure I could find a citable authority for that. -- Visviva (talk) 16:58, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

More than anything, it is likely a lack of attention to detail and/or someone who doesn't edit both articles... or someone who wouldn't know Bridgeport from Bridgeview (my hunch is the latter). Armour Square, as a community area, begins at the tracks/viaduct next to Stewart. Bridgeport and Armour Square get lumped together all the time. There are spillover neighborhoods that traverse 'Community Area' boundaries, but in the case where there is a major railway cutting or interstate cutting through areas it does kinda divide the neighborhoods cleanly as well as the community area. Ryecatcher773 (talk) 18:49, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Realted from Armour Square: The Armour article declares that Armour Square is "technically" in Bridgeport. If we want to treat these primarily as neighborhoods rather than as the more precisely defined community areas, do we have some source to point to over where these neighborhoods are? ~E$ (talk) 21:06, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed the problem. No idea when that BS was added, but I've removed the 'technically located in Bridgeport' as it's not technically located in Bridgeport. I live in Bridgeport, and while I realize that is not a citeable reference, I'll stand by that statement in the knowledege that there isn't any substantiated reference anywhere that will say that it is. Armour Square is a defined 'community area' and a neighborhood. The neighborhood being the smaller of the two (as the majority of the residential part of 'community area' is taken up by Chinatown).Ryecatcher773 (talk) 23:17, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bridgeport, Chicago. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:26, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Bridgeport, Chicago. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:08, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bridgeport, Chicago. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:31, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]