Talk:Cessna

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Tone[edit]

Is it just me, or do I detect a supercilious snarky attitude against Cessna in this article? Read the description of the marketing terms for the various Cessna features. Not necessary, in my opinion, to make derogatory editorial comments.98.162.136.248 (talk) 19:02, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not seeing that. Specifically which words do you think are a problem? - Ahunt (talk) 19:32, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I would not call it a supercilious snarky attitude but just plain facts. It seems to be cited and although Wikipedia does not like personal anecdotes, I worked in one of their Avionics shops in the mid 1970s and was astounded at the remarkable decline in the quality of the aircraft and avionics in those years. It would appear from reading the article, the mid 1970s was the beginning of a permanent decline for the company. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.23.224.41 (talk)

Cessna push/pull twin[edit]

I see no mention of this iconic aircraft?? 68.102.137.219 (talk) 17:37, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]