Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jerome Blake

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep (no consensus). Mindspillage (spill yours?) 03:57, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Jerome Blake[edit]

Vanity. Delete. - Mike Rosoft 16:53, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, a long bit about his schooling, a throwaway comment on being an extra in Star Wars (IMDB list a Jerome Blake as a Star Wars extra - in the newest three, rather than the first trilogy- but says he's ten years older and English). Average Earthman 18:02, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, article does not establish notability. / Alarm 18:03, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete vanity. - Etacar11 18:32, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Vanity. Jayjg ^(talk) 21:21, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not notable, vanity. Megan1967 05:29, 27 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep not notable? He's been in 8 films. Five of which are very notable, reguardless that he wasn't credited or was a voice actor (which btw, is still considered acting). I strongly suggest that the article be improved and NOT deleted. We keep several articles of much lesser known people, some of who ONLY write articles for a news company, and just because there name is in the paper, they're considered notable? Please reconsider your votes. Thanks <>Who 04:43, 31 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. His roles in the Star Wars prequels have made him more notable. -- Riffsyphon1024 03:52, Jun 3, 2005 (UTC)
Keep, but add a cleanup tag. 96T 13:59, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.