Talk:Hundred Schools of Thought

China: History High‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Chinese history (assessed as High-importance).

Philosophy: Eastern High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Eastern philosophy

Public domain?[edit]

Parts of this article came from "the U.S. Library of Congress, Country Studies/Area Handbook" [1]. Is the material really in public domain? - Mandel - May 8, 2004

Copy editing[edit]

Improvements to the English have been made by many contributors. I do not see anything wrong with the English now. Ought not the administrators remove this article from the "need copy-editing" category? PM Poon 08:51, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'm doing a bit more tidying & copy-editing, then I'll remove the notice (but it doesn't take an admin to do it). --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 16:15, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Hobbes[edit]

When reading about Xun Zi did anyone think about Thomas Hobbes?

"Other Schools" ironic[edit]

Naming things in this way makes the same seem as though it were different.

Addition of unreferenced information[edit]

I see that this article continues to be used as a dumping ground for unreferenced material. I think it's time we start pruning and weeding. Viriditas (talk) 23:38, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad to see that you are volunteering to read through all the books & papers on the topic, to really improve the article and not just delete material. So few are willing! --Gwern (contribs) 16:13 28 September 2010 (GMT)

Hundred Schools and Chinese philosophy[edit]

The content of Hundred Schools of Thought and Chinese philosophy are similar in content. In hundred schools of thought, might it be more useful to give the definitions of the stated texts, and direct users to the Chinese philosophy page for the overviews? Because if I can, that's what I'll try and do if there's no objection, moving relevant material to the other page. Otherwise, if we do not want to have the book statements, we've just got duplicate pages here, and they ought to be merged. I also think it's very unscholarly to list them according to original source and then give a modern commentary, whereas people might actually appreciate having the statements of the books themselves at hand.FourLights (talk) 17:55, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hundred Schools of Thought. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060927122311/http://www.chinaculture.org/gb/en_aboutchina/2003-09/24/content_23009.htm to http://www.chinaculture.org/gb/en_aboutchina/2003-09/24/content_23009.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:06, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

٥[edit]

اا ٨غعغا خ ه 196.155.4.21 (talk) 12:46, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]