Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2005 January 6

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 6[edit]

Joshua DePalloc[edit]

Another hoax. --fvw* 19:19, 2005 Jan 6 (UTC)

Someone out there is trying to create his own universe, obviously. Delete 23skidoo 03:45, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete as silly vandalism, hoax. Wyss 03:52, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete non-existent actor who's not even on IMDB. --Deathphoenix 00:41, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Revengeance[edit]

Is this a made-up word? Deb 19:42, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete -- If it is a real word then it belongs in Wiktionary, not here. DCEdwards1966 20:07, Jan 6, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete as original research dicdef. DreamGuy 21:12, Jan 6, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete as vanity neologism. Wyss 03:51, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Xezbeth 06:12, Jan 7, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete for the same reasons as DCEdwards1966. --Deathphoenix 00:42, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Noctopthalmophobia[edit]

Google shows 0 hits for this "term" DCEdwards1966 20:12, Jan 6, 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete, Neologism. The correct spelling would be "nyctophthalmophobia", if I'm not mistaken (no, that doesn't Google either). Note that "ophthalmophobia" (the fear of being stared at) is real. No doubt there's a specific variant that only gives you the heebie jeebies at night, but this doesn't even get close to triskaidekaphobia in the interesting phobias department. JRM 20:25, 2005 Jan 6 (UTC)
  • Delete for reasons above. Since it doesn't exist, might warrant speedy delete under disruption/hoax theory. DreamGuy 21:11, Jan 6, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete as an original classification. Wyss 03:49, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete' a non-existent term. --Deathphoenix 00:45, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Clementine Kruczynski (Drink)[edit]

A vanity cocktail. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 20:14, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete as vanity, article provides no evidence of notability or interest. Wyss 03:48, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete vanity article that would belong in the WikiCookbook anyway. --Deathphoenix 00:59, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, not notable. Megan1967 02:06, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Save, transfer to the wikicookbooks

Paderliga[edit]

Google shows 19 hits, all in German, so I can't verify any of the information. It is, presumably non-notable though. DCEdwards1966 20:16, Jan 6, 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete, ad for a blog. Wyss 03:47, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Not encyclopedic. Xezbeth 06:11, Jan 7, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete' vanity article. --Deathphoenix 00:59, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Brittany smart[edit]

I admit I don't know much about this sport, but I would be dubious as to whether the subject is notable even if it were at the correct title. Deb 20:33, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete. There are a million other half-decent university basketball players out there. Nothing apparently special about this one. Title needs capitalization fixing, too. 23skidoo 22:11, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, not notable. Megan1967 01:40, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete nn. Wyss 03:45, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, not notable. --Deathphoenix 02:12, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Emmanuel Killo[edit]

Probable hoax. No Google hits and this page is interlinked with the Rudolph Nurcey VfD candidate above. 23skidoo 20:30, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete NN K1Bond007 21:23, Jan 6, 2005 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete as hoax, silly vandalism. Wyss 03:45, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, not notable. Megan1967 01:59, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete non-existent trainer of a non-existent boxer. --Deathphoenix 02:15, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Peculiarities of Ohio place names 2[edit]

Moved to talk page, see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Peculiarities of Ohio place names 2

Aloysius[edit]

Moved to talk page, see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Aloysius

Lee Joo Hyung[edit]

Article makes no claim of notability. Thue | talk 21:51, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete, nn, almost a speedy for lack of context and little content. Wyss 03:40, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, not notable. Megan1967 01:57, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete vanity. --Deathphoenix 02:25, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Geoff bone[edit]

Besides the bad capitalization and the really ugly article, this is a non-notable charity worker. RickK 22:08, Jan 6, 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete, probably vanity, definitely unencyclopedic. — Ливай | 22:11, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete as nn, possible vanity. Wyss 03:33, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Xezbeth 06:10, Jan 7, 2005 (UTC)
  • 'Delete. not-notable, looked on google. not much. Miffed 23:41, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, not notable. Megan1967 01:56, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, agreed, not much on Google. The external link came up blank as well. --Deathphoenix 02:33, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Batkin[edit]

Little known slang started by a "group of teens". Make that a delete. --BesigedB (talk) 22:15, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC)

  • 69.140.195.18 changed talk of "teens" to "hebrew and slavic origin" [8] while at the same time blanking this page [9]. --BesigedB (talk) 22:28, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC)

I am sorry, i didn't mean to blank this page.

  • Delete. Little know slang doesn't belong in a dictionary. - Jeltz talk 23:21, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC)
    • Much less an encyclopedia. Delete. — Ливай | 09:02, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, nn. Wyss 03:32, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Patent nonsense. Speedy delete.Martg76 15:55, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, not notable. Megan1967 01:55, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Obvious delete. Gamaliel 01:58, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete this non-notable, batkin article.--Deathphoenix 02:35, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Corporal James Orourke[edit]

More vanity from 62.254.64.12 (Put up for deletion by OneGuy)

Delete. Incoherent gabble. I couldn't establish notability with Google. At very least it needs cleanup. Grox 01:12, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Delete I don't think there's any chance of establishing notabilty. He was a corporal and the military medal is not one of the highest British military decorations. Philip 02:23, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)

  • Transwiki to Wikisource, then Delete, nn. Wyss 03:31, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • delete OneGuy 07:31, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, not notable. Megan1967 01:54, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete not notable. Probably written by the good corporal's grandchild. --Deathphoenix 02:36, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)

PhysiqueduSolide[edit]

Moved from Wikipedia:Pages needing translation into English:

  • Looks French... and almost like a cut&paste from a physics textbook ("Chapitre I - Introduction"), though Googling didn't turn up any matches. From an unregistered user with 1 edit. 68.81.231.127 11:11, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
    • It's about solid-state physics and looks like a copy & paste from something else. Judging by the random code, I'd say it was a computer file of some sort but I don't know what kind. It's also annoyingly lacking in diacritics. If it's not a copyvio I could perhaps add them and transwiki it into the substub fr:Physique du solide. Ливай | 19:56, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • French, textbook, accents got lost. Probable copyvio, too. And the title is in French and no spaces. Lupo 12:11, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)

<end moved text>

  • Given the above, and given that it's now sat there for 2 weeks with no one bothering to take it any further (e.g. to translate), I say the simplest thing to do i delete. -- Jmabel | Talk 23:37, Jan 6, 2005 (UTC)
    • I agree that deleting this would be better than translating the possible copyvio, doing major format cleanup, and merging it with the various articles related to solid-state physics, which already discuss the topic more clearly and elegantly, especially for the layperson who only wants a cursory knowledge of the topic or is just beginning to study it. This article dives into a flurry of mathematical symbols by the second paragraph and is littered with unexplained jargon. — Ливай | 00:41, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete it as a fork. Wyss 03:29, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete as useless to us in this state and a french duplication of covered subjects. hfool/Roast me 02:55, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Ernestolynch[edit]

A guy who posts on a bulletin board. Delete, even if he is "a charming bastard". --Stormie 23:37, Jan 6, 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete but somebody should start a Charmingbastardclopedia. Starblind 00:19, Jan 7, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, platform for a link, ad, almost a speedy. Wyss 03:26, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Xezbeth 06:10, Jan 7, 2005 (UTC)

Nonsense - this guy represents more than a poster - it's a social movement amongst anti-authoritarian and anti-capitalist protestors in the UK.

  • Delete. Non-notable. Warofdreams 11:00, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, not notable. Megan1967 01:53, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete this charming, Celtic bastard. --Deathphoenix 02:50, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete the article, but do not delete the person :) 129.177.61.124 12:37, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Factions within the United States Democratic Party[edit]

Either a copyvio (though I can't find the original), or somebody's thesis. RickK 23:51, Jan 6, 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete, this is an essay, smacks too much of a fork with original research. Wyss 03:25, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, original research. Megan1967 01:53, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, Concur with Wyss and Megan1967. Edeans 04:54, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, crap. Neutralitytalk 04:56, Jan 9, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete original research. --Deathphoenix 02:58, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Lady Gwynne Thompson[edit]

Moved to talk page, see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Lady Gwynne Thompson

Liquid Democracy (vote for undeletion)[edit]

See https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Deletion_review&oldid=9192242#Liquid_Democracy

Which would be fine advice if that existed. -- Jmabel | Talk 03:20, Jan 8, 2005 (UTC)
Changed to the last revision containing it. JesseW, the juggling janitor 02:50, 12 October 2016 (UTC)