Talk:List of cognitive biases

Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of cognitive biases article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2: 90 days

Extraordinarity bias was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 15 December 2009 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into List of cognitive biases. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Lists Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Psychology High‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

Business High‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cognitive science (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cognitive science, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Cognitive scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Cognitive scienceTemplate:WikiProject Cognitive scienceCognitive science articles

Philosophy: Logic Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Logic

This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

This article has been mentioned by multiple media organizations:

Ben Yagoda (September 2018). "Your Lying Mind". The Atlantic. Retrieved 2 September 2018. Wikipedia's "List of cognitive biases" contains 185 entries, from actor-observer bias ("the tendency for explanations of other individuals' behaviors to overemphasize the influence of their personality and underemphasize the influence of their situation … and for explanations of one's own behaviors to do the opposite") to the Zeigarnik effect ("uncompleted or interrupted tasks are remembered better than completed ones").
Cognitive bias cheat sheet (1 September 2016). "Buster Benson". Better Humans (betterhumans.pub) via Medium. Retrieved 11 April 2022. I've spent many years referencing Wikipedia's list of cognitive biases whenever I have a hunch that a certain type of thinking is an official bias but I can't recall the name or details. It's been an invaluable reference for helping me identify the hidden flaws in my own thinking. Nothing else I've come across seems to be both as comprehensive and as succinct. However, honestly, the Wikipedia page is a bit of a tangled mess.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of List of memory biases was merged into List of cognitive biases with this edit on 10:50, 10 December 2021. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Personocentrism: personhood-biasing, personocracy, to deem personhood (hypernymous to humanhood) the sole criterion[edit]

Google is male-biased using the face of non-androcentrism. (Kindness-biasing. I am kind, I support you, but in a way founded on the old values, with the mere addition of negation.)

When a woman Googles about the personhood-biasing against the mathematical universe, is forced to read that the sole criterion and our only focus on all topics is the males; even as enemies or evildoers. Thought beyond maledom isn't the mere anti-androcracy!

The antonyms of personocentrism/personocracy/person-biasing/personhood-biasing are mathocentrism/mathocracy/math-biasing, scientocentrism/scientocracy/science-biasing[edit]

Most people are personocentrist, not mathocentrist.

In economy people are mathocentrist and egocentrist. They themselves are people. The term personocentrism/personocracy/personhood-biasing is problematic, because they themselves are people, but they don't necessarily care about others being nonsociocentrist, -ic/sociocratist, -ic/social-biasing.

Single-action bias[edit]

single-action bias - relying on only one action to reduce a threat.: blogs.edf.org/markets/2011/08/09/single-action-bias

Not sure where this fits in. --evrik ^(talk) 04:37, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Related: Action_bias#Single

Maybe it can be mentioned under the action bias section? IrrationalBeing (talk) 20:54, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Addition of Fluency Heuristic[edit]

"Fluency Heuristic" or similar appears to be missing from the list.

In contrast to the "Rhyme as Reason", the Fluency Heuristic applies to a wider set of statements beyond those that rhyme but also have an increased ease of cognitive processing (eg catchphrases), as is supported by the information on the page dedicated to the Fluency_heuristic. Thus, it appears to be an omission on the main list of cognitive biases.

Suggest adding it in the List of cognitive biases#Truthiness section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Minogully (talk • contribs) 19:10, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Agency bias[edit]

Doesn't seem to be included - maybe I missed it. Could start with this paper on Motion, identity and the bias toward agency. Shtove (talk) 08:34, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Could this be a synonym of agent detection bias? Paradoctor (talk) 12:23, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]