Talk:Lake Victoria (New South Wales)

	Lakes portal Lake Victoria (New South Wales) is within the scope of WikiProject Lakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of lake-related articles on Wikipedia, using the tools on the project page. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LakesWikipedia:WikiProject LakesTemplate:WikiProject LakesLakes articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Lake Victoria (New South Wales) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Untitled[edit]

What did I do wrong to the Category entry here? ScottDavis 11:32, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)

You used {{...}} (which is for templates) instead of [[...]]. It appears now that anything can be a template, not just stuff in the "Template:" namespace, so {{Category:Lakes of Australia|Victoria}} actually inserted the contents of Category:Lakes of Australia into the article. Weird. Geoff/Gsl 11:39, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Thanks. How do you discover these things so quickly? You fixed the page only 8 minutes after I created it! -- ScottDavis 12:21, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Pure chance. Such is the way of Wikipedia... Geoff/Gsl 22:07, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Contradiction[edit]

naturally occurring vs. was constructed. — 2dk (talk) 23:27, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@2dk: I haven't checked article history to see if this was previously ambiguous and been fixed. What the article now says in not contradictory: The lake is (was) naturally occurring, but an embankment and regulators were constructed in the 1920s to increase its capacity so both statements are true. --Scott Davis ^Talk 04:00, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]