Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canyon Crest Academy 2

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - kept - SimonP 02:41, May 23, 2005 (UTC)

Canyon Crest Academy 2[edit]

Non-notable, delete. Neutrality^talk 04:52, May 17, 2005 (UTC)

Delete unless wikipedia wants a boring, pointless article for every average school in every country. CDThieme
Keep. Looks like a nice school. No cheerleaders but I suppose you can't have everything. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 05:26, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, specialized. Gazpacho 05:28, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. High schools are notable. This school has survived one VfD, why nominated it again? Is there a better chance that the consensus will be to delete this time around? --BaronLarf 05:32, May 17, 2005 (UTC)
Keep schools. Verifiable and NPOV. First, preserve knowledge, then expand knowledge. Thanks to Neutrality, I've had no time for adding content today. --Unfocused 05:37, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep again. Kappa 06:00, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and see if it stays dead this time. And I hope "Envision" is deliberately spelled like that. Master Thief Garrett 07:35, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into San Diego, California and delete - Skysmith 09:26, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.JuntungWu 12:42, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Subject should be verifiable. - SimonP 13:23, May 17, 2005 (UTC)
Keep. Encyclopedic, verifiable and NPOV. Meets all agreed-upon Wikipedia standards. Like some others, I will be copy-pasting this to all the high school votes since Neutrality seems to have mass-suggested articles for VfD simply because of a POV judgment of their subject--Cynical 13:44, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep this fine little article Lupin 14:12, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep schools in wikipedia. --Howrealisreal 14:52, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, vanity. R adiant _* 15:02, May 17, 2005 (UTC)
Keep -- Longhair | Talk 17:00, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep schools. Inherently notable (expect to be seeing this posted quite a few times). R Calvete 19:45, 2005 May 17 (UTC)
Delete. Useless collection of generic facts about an insignificant school. This is not an encyclopedia article. Individual schools are not inherently encyclopedic and there is nothing to distinguish insignificant schools like this one from thousands of nearly identical schools around the world. Gamaliel 20:23, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the schoolcruft. Ketsuban has spoken. The debate is over. 21:06, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Bogus (non-policy) nomination - notability is still not a listed deletion criterion - David Gerard 23:16, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-notable. Quale 23:49, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with San Diego, California per my school article policy. Kelly Martin 02:01, May 18, 2005 (UTC)
Keep. And cool it with the rounds of school vfds. This article was already the subject of a vfd and it survived. --Zantastik 02:45, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
keep again please it already survived Yuckfoo 13:23, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Introduce a limit of 3 nominations per day. CalJW 18:41, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete = not notable. NoAccount 02:54, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep schools in wikipedia. -dozenist 05:21, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete; fails to establish encyclopedic worthiness. If Delete fails, then Merge. Jayjg ^(talk) 18:19, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notable school. User:GRider/Schoolwatch Klonimus 23:25, 22 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.