User talk:Jannex

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hi there, Jannex! Welcome to Wikipedia. If you want, you can drop us a note at Wikipedia:New user log to introduce yourself.

You should also feel free to drop me a question any time on my talk page.

Happy editing! JOHN COLLISON (An Liúdramán) 23:26, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)


Infoboxes[edit]

Thanks for fixing the colours in the Dream Theater-related album pages... do you know if there is any style guide for music DVDs (eg LIT)? plattopus (talk) 18:19, Mar 30, 2005 (UTC)

  • No, I do not know anything about DVDs. I was wondering if I should use live album color for Live at Budokan (Dream Theater), but as it is also a DVD, I left it as it is now. --Jannex 18:22, Mar 30, 2005 (UTC)
    • Yeah it's a tough one... I think as long as the colours are standard across all DT albums (so people skipping through the chonology aren't disoriented) it should be OK, even if they aren't actual standards yet. Maybe we could set up a standard Infobox for music VHS/DVDs? plattopus (talk) 18:29, Mar 30, 2005 (UTC)

Removing inter-Wiki links[edit]

I understand why you removed the inter-wiki links on The Hogwarts Founders, but it won't work in the long run, unless you run through all the Wikis and make the same change. They're updated by bots that follow redirects, so they cause links like this when there's not a one-to-one connection.--Prosfilaes 23:56, 20 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

  • You are right, I'll go through all the wikis. --Jannex 10:36, 21 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    • Now all the pages are updated, so bots shouldn't make any mistakes any more. --Jannex 10:39, 21 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again! Given the opinion you gave at the request for comment on archives I thought you might be interested to know the issue has now been put to a straw poll and could use your vote! Staxringold 00:43, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Marco Casagrande astroturfing[edit]

As an administrator (albeit of the Finnish wikipedia, but an administrator nonetheless), I'm a little bit surprised that you would let such behavior slide in the Marco Casagrande article. Every article, every edit, every word that was contributed by the sockpuppets is suspect and unreliable. Does notability trump willful abuse of Wikipedia? DarkAudit 16:16, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what is the problem. The same user tried to spam Marco Casagrande article in Finnish Wikipedia, but he was reverted. So basically Marco Casagrande is notable as a person, but the current article may have to be rewritten. Perhaps the best solution is to start with a new stub? --Jannex 20:21, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ingo Molnár[edit]

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Ingo Molnár, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. mms 16:36, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I left you a note on your Finnish talk page--we could use a Finnish-speaking editor in this deletion discussion. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 16:11, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 18[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Futurice, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lean (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Jannex. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Jannex. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]