User talk:Dmanning

This user may have left Wikipedia. Dmanning has not edited Wikipedia since 6 May 2022. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

If you return to editing please delete the above template. Are you really D.S. Manning? Long time no see!

Cahill[edit]

I added a bit to the page. I did not read it. I heard an interview with the author for an hour or two and a book review. When I wrote about it on QEII's page, it was met with a lot of skepticism. You can see the details on her page in the history. --Filll 15:28, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Films Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

File:Transparent film reel and film.png

Hey, welcome to the Films WikiProject! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of films and film characters. If you haven't already, please add {{User WikiProject Films}} to your user page.

A few features that you might find helpful:

Most of our important discussions about the project itself and its related articles take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.

The project has a monthly newsletter. The newsletter for December has been published. January's issue is currently in production; it will be delivered as a link, but several other formats are available.

There is a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:

Want to jump right into editing? The style guidelines show things you should include.
Want to assist in some current backlogs within the project? Visit the Film Tasks template to see how you can help.
Want to know how good our articles are? Our assessment department has rated the quality of every film article in Wikipedia. Check it out!
Want to collaborate on articles? The Cinema Collaboration of the Week picks an article every week to work on together.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask another fellow member, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Nehrams2020 01:47, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

I'm not even sure that I'm writing this in the correct area, but, I just wanted to thank you for the tip on how to post citation requests. Thanks -- :).

(Commando303)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs: Monkton Combe School; Justine Greening; River Marden; Jim Henson Television; Emma Kennedy; BMW M51; Certain Women; Bard the Bowman; John Cole; Piers Flint-Shipman; Robert Horton; Hilmartin; Shiulie Ghosh; The Naked Civil Servant; Julia Hartley-Brewer; Sheila Kuehl; London SE5; Rhys Chatham; Ad Gentes

Cleanup: Michael Romeo; Chrysler Flathead engine; Richard Littlejohn
Merge: Question Time; Faceparty; Criticism of Wal-Mart
Add Sources: Tablet PC; Russell Group; Pansexuality
Wikify: The Light Bearer; Bhagwant Mann; Barbara Ehrenreich
Expand: Government spending; Refugee Council; Mazda B-Series

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 16:09, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Question[edit]

What is wrong with an LSO link that you removed and marked as 'linkspam'? It seems like a perfectly acceptable link to me. Pretender2j 06:44, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, seemed suspicious at the time, should've followed link. Seem to have started a small edit war too, apologies Dmanning 08:35, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Films Newsletter[edit]

The January 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Nehrams2020 07:18, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Thanks for the tip, still learning wiki-ettiquette and the Churchill Bar is quite cool. Rohitde 12:35, 2 Feb 2007 (UTC)

NS copyright[edit]

In regards to your request that I remove a copyrighted article from my own server - that was actually to be the next step - I thought however that I would extend an invitation to place the article elsewhere before I remove it from my site, although perhaps it would have been prudent to have pointed that out. dialagranny 05:19, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lovely Country[edit]

Why do you keep changing the Lovely page back to the original version? It's rubbish, it's full of lies.

Blog[edit]

If the material is in the Guardian, we should link to it. If it's not there or elsewhere, it's unpublished, except for on the author's blog, and we avoid self-published material as far as possible on WP, for obvious reasons. Added to which, this particular blog is being added to multiple articles, almost to the point of spamming, so it needs to be removed when not strictly necessary, and the only place it's really needed is in the article about the blog owner. See WP:V, which is policy. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 08:59, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I know what it says because I wrote it. :-) We do nevertheless avoid blogs whenever possible, and particularly when the material is published elsewhere, as this was. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 00:02, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Joe Trohman[edit]

I missed that one. Thanks. - Dan D. Ric 08:01, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I thought that page was semi-protected from some of the older edits, what happened? Dmanning 08:05, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dunno. I just posted a question Here. -- Dan D. Ric 08:09, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Syracuse New Times[edit]

Thank you for requesting a citation in the Syracuse New Times article. That request has now been fulfilled! -newkai t-c 05:40, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films February Newsletter[edit]

The February 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Cbrown1023 talk 22:46, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Change article title?[edit]

Do you know how I might be able to change an article title? Or would I have to start a whole new one? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Caysonbelle (talk • contribs) 18:46, 1 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Re: BalderDash[edit]

Sorry about the late reply, been logged off for a long while.

The TV.com article is incorrect; Balderdash was definitely on for more than nine episodes. It aired five-a-week, with roughly 160 episodes. I have most of them on tape.

The network used to have a page with far more information, but that page is long gone.

Allstar87 07:11, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

April 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter[edit]

The April 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated notice by BrownBot 21:02, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

May 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter[edit]

The May 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated notice by BrownBot 21:38, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

June 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter[edit]

The June 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Please also, if you have not already, add your name to the Member List. Nehrams2020 07:51, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hey u[edit]

why cant u leave my editing of the knights of prosperity alone? dont think about it just stop erasing what i write. just let it go.

u Socialist and Humanist Vegetarian, its your fault theres so much crime in this country, and its your fualt theres so much violence in our country. u r ruining our scociety and u and ur people should be ashamed. and at least i have friends and not wasted my life on the sci fi channel

do u feel good about yourself right now? let the revision go —Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{1}}}|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/{{{1}}}|contribs]])

I dont live in the US, pretty clear from my bio. I count 6 separate users and IP addresses who revert your edit. You have a 500 signature petition which may or may not have had any effect on anything, doesn't make for a great addition. You can keep trolling if you like (and threats to keep adding the same info if its ever removed is trolling) but you will be blocked, personal attacks on me wont help you.

ok fine im sorry bout that. but why cant you just let go, its just a stupid rule. who would be suffering by mey editing?

I, and every other person who reads this information (accept you, I guess). I'd like a Wikipedia article about me, can I really say to everybody to "just let it go"?
The thing is, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and people know that the information they find here is reliable. Your site is personal propagenda, and a reader who reads your version of The Knights of Prosperity will be led to believe that your site is big and significant, while it's not. You can post that info in boards and forums, but not here. We can live with that link at the bottom, but that's it (and you should be thankfull even for that - your site is not important enough to be here at all, so thinking that it should get a full paragraph is just stupid (in a small article to begin with. it would be like 1/5 of the article)).
Please stop reverting, you're wasting both our and your time (and you WILL be blocked if you keep on reverting). Godfather ♣ Talk ♣ 23:18, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

July 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter[edit]

The July 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated delivery by BrownBot 18:22, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

August 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter[edit]

The August 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This is an automated delivery by BrownBot 03:36, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films roll call[edit]

Hey fellow Wikipedian! Your username is listed on the WikiProject Films participants list, but we are unsure as to which editors are still active on the project. If you still consider yourself an active WP:FILM editor, please add your name to the Active Members list. You may also wish to add {{User WikiProject Films}} to your userpage, if you haven't done so already. We also have several task forces that you may be interested in joining as well.

Also, elections for Project Coordinators are currently in sign-up phase. If you would be interested in running, or would like to ask questions of the candidates, please take a look. You can see more information on the positions at Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Coordinators. Thanks and happy editing!

An automatic notification by BrownBot 23:06, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films September 2007 Newsletter[edit]

The September 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Please note that special delivery options have been reset and ignored for this issue due to the revamp of the membership list (outlined in further detail in the newsletter). If you would like to change your delivery settings for future issues, please follow the above link. I apologize for the inconvenience. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot 22:51, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films August 2008 Newsletter[edit]

The August 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:46, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FILMS Questionnaire[edit]

As a member of WikiProject Films, you are invited to take part in the project's first questionnaire. It is intended to gauge your participation and views on the project. At the conclusion of the questionnaire, the project's coordinators will use the gathered feedback to find new ways to improve the project and reach out to potential members. The results of the questionnaire will be published in next month's newsletter. If you know of any editors who have edited film articles in the past, please invite them to take part in the questionnaire. Please stop by and take a few minutes to answer the questions so that we can continue to improve our project. Happy editing!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:15, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest[edit]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Nomination of Kevin Cahill (author) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kevin Cahill (author) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Cahill (author) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Ganesha811 (talk) 19:14, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]