Talk:Common eland

Common eland has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 8, 2011	Peer review	Reviewed
September 28, 2011	Good article nominee	Not listed
May 11, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed
April 2, 2012	Peer review	Reviewed
June 5, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed
Current status: Good article

Mammals Mid‑importance

	Mammals portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Africa: Angola / DRC / Kenya / Namibia / South Africa / Tanzania / Zambia High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Angola (assessed as Top-importance).
	Democratic Republic of the Congo portal This article is supported by WikiProject Democratic Republic of the Congo (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Kenya portal This article is supported by WikiProject Kenya (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Namibia (assessed as Mid-importance).
	South Africa portal This article is supported by WikiProject South Africa (assessed as High-importance).
	Tanzania portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tanzania (assessed as Top-importance).
	Zambia portal This article is supported by WikiProject Zambia (assessed as Top-importance).

Ethiopia: Climate and environment Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethiopia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ethiopia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EthiopiaWikipedia:WikiProject EthiopiaTemplate:WikiProject EthiopiaEthiopia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Climate and environment.

Subfamily[edit]

I think an error occurred: the subfamily of common Eland is not "Bovinae" but "Antilopinae". I'm going to correct it.
--Suhardian 20:12, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)

The Taxonomic Information System, American Society of Mammalogists Index for the Mammalian Species and [1] classify eland in subfamily Bovinae. I Have reverted it back to Bovinae. -- Rooivalk 05:04, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

upto 3,5 m tall. The second tallest land animal then? Herds of upto 400? whos writing this?

These pages seem to agree, although the 3.5m figure does seem too high. I've adjusted it. [2] [3] [4]. Lunkwill 09:37, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Scientific Name

Should the scientific name be amended to Tragelaphus not Taurotragus? IUCN use Tragelaphus and has the note: The genus Taurotragus, in which the Common Eland and the Giant Eland, T. derbianus, are sometimes included, is here included in the genus Tragelaphus, in accordance with recent genetic evidence and classifications (see Kingdon in press for summary). Three subspecies of Common Eland have been recognized, although their validity requires investigation (Thouless in press). ^[1] Adelophryne (talk) 09:57, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Adelophryne Thanks for your suggestion. I have observed that Taurotragus is the commoner name, and the article already mentions that Tragelaphus is often used. It can not be really changed till we are completely sure. Sainsf <^>_{Talk all words} 12:52, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ http://www.iucnredlist.org/details/22055/0

Life span[edit]

How long does it live? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jnw222 (talk • contribs) 18:44, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It lives for 15-20 years generally, and some are recorded to be living for even 25 years. I've expanded this article and mentioned this fact about life span in the 'Description' section too. Thanks.--Sainsf<^> (talk) 14:11, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Uses[edit]

I don't think it is appropriate to call the Israel Defense Forces "Israel Occupation Army", even though it is called so in the source. --JewBask (talk) 03:07, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed that part. I don't think its source is so good to trust. --Sainsf <^> (talk) 01:42, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Page move?[edit]

Shouldn't this page be moved to Common eland, lower case "e"? Unless I'm missing something, that seems to be the implication of Wikipedia:Naming conventions (fauna)#Capitalisation and italicisation. WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules:^simple/_complex 13:34, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I have always thought of moving the article. After all, the whole article should have the 'e' either lower case or higher case, the former being more appropriate.--Sainsf <^> (talk) 11:50, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: already moved to Common eland by Topbanana. Uncontroversial like so many recent mammal renamings. Favonian (talk) 15:22, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Common Eland → Common eland – The 'e' in the Common Eland need not be capital anyhow. The lower case is much appropriate. But there is a redirect page, Common eland, that is causing problem. --Sainsf <^> (talk) 09:56, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support per WP:FNAME. Jenks24 (talk) 00:24, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support per WP:MAMMAL guidelines. Jack (talk) 09:32, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Size information inconsistent[edit]

The size and weight information in the lead is not entirely consistent with that at Common eland#Physical description. I would suggest that the lead be changed to give a less precise set of ranges consistent with the later information. Peter coxhead (talk) 10:37, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done. I have fixed it. I think it is consistent now.--Sainsf <^> (talk) 12:14, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Common Eland/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Stemonitis (talk · contribs · count) 17:37, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There is a lot of good material here, but I'm afraid there are too many problems for this to pass as a Good Article at the moment. Since it will take quite a lot of effort to fix, I'm failing the article straight away, but I hope you will not be disheartened and will renominate it at some point in the future once the issues have been addressed. To help in that effort, here are some things that should be improved:

A small thing to begin with. The article covers a (South) African topic, and should be written in the appropriate dialect of English, which is probably South African English (≈ BrE). Instead of writing "grayer color" for instance, it should be "greyer colour". Instead of "moose", use "elk" (as ref. 12 does).

Disambiguate dominance, juveniles, Nyika, Omo, plains and territory.

The taxonomy section needs more detail. It doesn't mention Peter Simon Pallas, and it doesn't name the subspecies, let alone describe their distributions or phenotypic differences.

Link the national parks directly – most of them have articles (Kruger National Park, Kagera National Park, etc.).

A bigger problem is with the sourcing. Quite a lot of the article is currently unsourced. Quite a lot of the sources that are used are not particularly reliable. Is this (refs. 2 and 3) really the best source for the Latin name? It certainly doesn't say anything about the synonymy. They are all formatted rather oddly, which makes it difficult to see which are authoritative and which are not. Ref. 12, for instance, is a very good source, and should be used much more. If the items in the Bibliography are sources, they should be cited inline.

Finally, there are problems of plagiarism or close paraphrasing, which is unacceptable. This sentence, for instance, is reproduced verbatim from reference 14, including the badly-formatted units: "Like its distant gazelle and oryx relatives, the eland can conserve water by raising its body temperature as much as 7° Celsius (13.5° Fahrenheit) on hot days." I only checked that citation in particular because that claim seemed so unlikely. I then saw that a few other parts of that source had been copied or altered very little.

Given all that, I had no choice but to fail the article. Sorry. --Stemonitis (talk) 17:37, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Common eland/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Oakley77 (talk · contribs) 02:13, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Review[edit]

Well-written:

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (prose)	As far as animal articles go, this one is good for this criteria	✓ Pass
(b) (MoS)	Passes here	✓ Pass

Verifiable with no original research:

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (references)	All refs are acceptable, useful, and pass.	✓ Pass
(b) (citations to reliable sources)	All citations in article are reliable	✓ Pass
(c) (original research)	Yes, it appears so	✓ Pass

Broad in its coverage:

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (major aspects)	Follows textbook form for organism articles, and covers vital points well.	✓ Pass
(b) (focused)	Indeed.	✓ Pass

Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.

Notes	Result
Neutral defines this article.	✓ Pass

Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.

Notes	Result
No edits disputes, wars, or conflicts	✓ Pass

Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales)	Creative and applicable image usage.	✓ Pass
(b) (appropriate use with suitable captions)	Adheres to this category.	✓ Pass

Result[edit]

Result	Notes
✓ Pass	All in all, this article has the stuff to be a GA!

Oakley77 (talk) 02:13, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion[edit]

Please add any related discussion here. Oakley77 (talk) 02:13, 11 May 2012 (UTC) This a well- done article, so I will go ahead and make it a GA!Oakley77 (talk) 02:59, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review[edit]

With all due respect to the nominator and the reviewer (of GA2) who have made this a well-written article, I see some problems here esp. in the references. Not all of them are templated/done in the same way, and some of them are not to reliable sources. References 3, 4, and 5 are not to a reliable source; surely there are better sources for these etymologies. The citation for ref 7 is incomplete, and ditto for 10 (besides, Oracle Thinkquest is NOT a reliable source). I corrected an error in the template for 16 (and put the notes in the proper order). Note 17 cites a chapter, but the inclusive page numbers aren't given (and it has pp. for a single page). This was a good reason to not pass it as a GA; if these errors are corrected and more, better sources are found, it can maintain GA status. Sorry, but them's the shakes. Drmies (talk) 15:36, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done. I have fixed these errors and added good references for the etymology. --Sainsf <^>_{Talk all words} 05:35, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

MSW3 online[edit]

Is there a reason why FN16 (ref name = wilson) only references the printed version, when there's a much more accessible online version here? The usual way to reference it would be {{MSW3 Artiodactyla | id = 14200717 | page = 696–7}}, giving:

Grubb, P. (2005). "Order Artiodactyla". In Wilson, D.E.; Reeder, D.M (eds.). Mammal Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (3rd ed.). Johns Hopkins University Press. p. 696–7. ISBN 978-0-8018-8221-0. OCLC 62265494.

--Stfg (talk) 13:29, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea. I have put that reference. Thanks for your help! --Sainsf <^>_{Talk all words} 05:05, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Common eland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110717063215/http://www.tititudorancea.com/z/common_eland.htm to http://www.tititudorancea.com/z/common_eland.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:32, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Common eland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110109233047/http://ultimateungulate.com/Artiodactyla/Taurotragus_oryx.html to http://www.ultimateungulate.com/Artiodactyla/Taurotragus_oryx.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:12, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Common eland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:57, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Environmental physiology[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 August 2022 and 5 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Saraknowsthings (article contribs). Peer reviewers: THERooster10, Zofiax13.

— Assignment last updated by Jessicaphillips10 (talk) 01:16, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttp://www.iucnredlist.org/details/22055/0

[1]

GA toolbox
Reviewing
Templates Criteria Instructions

GA toolbox
Reviewing
Templates Criteria Instructions